信息子集信任收益分析中的互信息

R. Bustin, C. V. Goldman
{"title":"信息子集信任收益分析中的互信息","authors":"R. Bustin, C. V. Goldman","doi":"10.11159/icsta22.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"- Information can increase trust of humans in automated machines. However, assessing the impact of all combinations of information pieces on the trust level of humans might not be practical. This paper assumes that data can be collected from human participants having interacted with some automated machine. We assume a two-stage study in which the participants initially submit their ranking (trust level) when no information is provided, and then provide additional independent rankings for each piece of additional information. The goal is to determine the best combination of information pieces over all combinations without directly asking the participants to rank the possible combinations. The impact of the combinations on the trust ranking is evaluated using the mutual information quantity. We further consider the question of statistical significance in this unique setting, and suggest an optimization objective that examines the trade-off between the impact of the subset on the trust measure, on the one hand, while considering the complexity of the subset, measured by the size of the subset (number of additional pieces of information), on the other hand. We provide a numerical example that shows all aspects discussed in this work.","PeriodicalId":325859,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Statistics: Theory and Applications","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mutual Information in the Analysis of Trust Gains from Subsets of Information\",\"authors\":\"R. Bustin, C. V. Goldman\",\"doi\":\"10.11159/icsta22.110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"- Information can increase trust of humans in automated machines. However, assessing the impact of all combinations of information pieces on the trust level of humans might not be practical. This paper assumes that data can be collected from human participants having interacted with some automated machine. We assume a two-stage study in which the participants initially submit their ranking (trust level) when no information is provided, and then provide additional independent rankings for each piece of additional information. The goal is to determine the best combination of information pieces over all combinations without directly asking the participants to rank the possible combinations. The impact of the combinations on the trust ranking is evaluated using the mutual information quantity. We further consider the question of statistical significance in this unique setting, and suggest an optimization objective that examines the trade-off between the impact of the subset on the trust measure, on the one hand, while considering the complexity of the subset, measured by the size of the subset (number of additional pieces of information), on the other hand. We provide a numerical example that shows all aspects discussed in this work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Statistics: Theory and Applications\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Statistics: Theory and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11159/icsta22.110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Statistics: Theory and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11159/icsta22.110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

信息可以增加人们对自动化机器的信任。然而,评估信息片段的所有组合对人类信任水平的影响可能是不切实际的。本文假设可以从与某些自动化机器交互的人类参与者那里收集数据。我们假设一个两阶段的研究,参与者最初在没有提供信息的情况下提交他们的排名(信任水平),然后为每一条额外的信息提供额外的独立排名。目标是在所有组合中确定信息片段的最佳组合,而不是直接要求参与者对可能的组合进行排序。利用互信息量来评价组合对信任排序的影响。我们进一步考虑了这种独特设置中的统计显著性问题,并提出了一个优化目标,该目标一方面检查了子集对信任度量的影响之间的权衡,另一方面考虑了子集的复杂性,由子集的大小(额外信息块的数量)衡量。我们提供了一个数值例子,显示了在这项工作中讨论的所有方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mutual Information in the Analysis of Trust Gains from Subsets of Information
- Information can increase trust of humans in automated machines. However, assessing the impact of all combinations of information pieces on the trust level of humans might not be practical. This paper assumes that data can be collected from human participants having interacted with some automated machine. We assume a two-stage study in which the participants initially submit their ranking (trust level) when no information is provided, and then provide additional independent rankings for each piece of additional information. The goal is to determine the best combination of information pieces over all combinations without directly asking the participants to rank the possible combinations. The impact of the combinations on the trust ranking is evaluated using the mutual information quantity. We further consider the question of statistical significance in this unique setting, and suggest an optimization objective that examines the trade-off between the impact of the subset on the trust measure, on the one hand, while considering the complexity of the subset, measured by the size of the subset (number of additional pieces of information), on the other hand. We provide a numerical example that shows all aspects discussed in this work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信