ESG重要性准则对资本市场的影响

Theresa Spandel, Frank Schiemann, Andreas G. F. Hoepner
{"title":"ESG重要性准则对资本市场的影响","authors":"Theresa Spandel, Frank Schiemann, Andreas G. F. Hoepner","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3694285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the capital market reaction in response to the publication of the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board’s (SASB) standards on the financial materiality of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. Based on the argument that accounting mechanisms impact perceptions through precision, we expect the SASB standards’ classifications of ESG items as either financially material or financially immaterial to impact investors’ assessments of firms. We employ a pooled event study exploiting the staggered release of the sector-specific standards from 2013 to 2016. We find a negative capital market reaction following the standards’ publication for firms with low material ESG performance and a positive capital market reaction for firms with high material ESG performance. The reaction is stronger, in both magnitude and significance, for low-performing firms. Our findings indicate that voluntary non-financial accounting standards influence investors’ perceptions about firm value.","PeriodicalId":387203,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Sustainable Business (Topic)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capital Market Effects of ESG Materiality Standards\",\"authors\":\"Theresa Spandel, Frank Schiemann, Andreas G. F. Hoepner\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3694285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate the capital market reaction in response to the publication of the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board’s (SASB) standards on the financial materiality of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. Based on the argument that accounting mechanisms impact perceptions through precision, we expect the SASB standards’ classifications of ESG items as either financially material or financially immaterial to impact investors’ assessments of firms. We employ a pooled event study exploiting the staggered release of the sector-specific standards from 2013 to 2016. We find a negative capital market reaction following the standards’ publication for firms with low material ESG performance and a positive capital market reaction for firms with high material ESG performance. The reaction is stronger, in both magnitude and significance, for low-performing firms. Our findings indicate that voluntary non-financial accounting standards influence investors’ perceptions about firm value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Sustainable Business (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Sustainable Business (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3694285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Sustainable Business (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3694285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们调查了资本市场对可持续会计准则委员会(SASB)关于环境、社会和治理(ESG)问题的财务重要性的标准发布的反应。基于会计机制通过准确性影响感知的观点,我们期望SASB标准将ESG项目分类为财务重要或财务不重要,以影响投资者对公司的评估。我们采用了一项汇总事件研究,利用了2013年至2016年行业特定标准的交错发布。我们发现,在标准发布后,资本市场对实质性ESG绩效较低的公司的反应为负,而对实质性ESG绩效较高的公司的反应为正。对于表现不佳的公司,这种反应在规模和意义上都更为强烈。我们的研究结果表明,自愿性非财务会计准则影响投资者对公司价值的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Capital Market Effects of ESG Materiality Standards
We investigate the capital market reaction in response to the publication of the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board’s (SASB) standards on the financial materiality of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. Based on the argument that accounting mechanisms impact perceptions through precision, we expect the SASB standards’ classifications of ESG items as either financially material or financially immaterial to impact investors’ assessments of firms. We employ a pooled event study exploiting the staggered release of the sector-specific standards from 2013 to 2016. We find a negative capital market reaction following the standards’ publication for firms with low material ESG performance and a positive capital market reaction for firms with high material ESG performance. The reaction is stronger, in both magnitude and significance, for low-performing firms. Our findings indicate that voluntary non-financial accounting standards influence investors’ perceptions about firm value.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信