{"title":"集成努力估计中线性组合规则的比较研究","authors":"S. Amasaki","doi":"10.1109/SEAA.2017.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Software effort estimation is a critical factor for project success. A new approach called ensemble effort estimation gets popular because of its performance. While many combination rules have been proposed, they were only compared in a systematic literature review. Objective: To compare linear combination rules proposed in the past studies under the same condition based on empirical approach. Method: We conducted an experiment with 9 linear combination rules, 7 datasets, and 4 effort estimation models. Results: We found 6 out of 9 linear combination rules never underperformed its base learners. No linear combination rule was superior to the others. Conclusion: No definitive rule was found while some linear combination rules can give competitive or better estimates than its base learners.","PeriodicalId":151513,"journal":{"name":"2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study on Linear Combination Rules for Ensemble Effort Estimation\",\"authors\":\"S. Amasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEAA.2017.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Software effort estimation is a critical factor for project success. A new approach called ensemble effort estimation gets popular because of its performance. While many combination rules have been proposed, they were only compared in a systematic literature review. Objective: To compare linear combination rules proposed in the past studies under the same condition based on empirical approach. Method: We conducted an experiment with 9 linear combination rules, 7 datasets, and 4 effort estimation models. Results: We found 6 out of 9 linear combination rules never underperformed its base learners. No linear combination rule was superior to the others. Conclusion: No definitive rule was found while some linear combination rules can give competitive or better estimates than its base learners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2017.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2017.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Study on Linear Combination Rules for Ensemble Effort Estimation
Context: Software effort estimation is a critical factor for project success. A new approach called ensemble effort estimation gets popular because of its performance. While many combination rules have been proposed, they were only compared in a systematic literature review. Objective: To compare linear combination rules proposed in the past studies under the same condition based on empirical approach. Method: We conducted an experiment with 9 linear combination rules, 7 datasets, and 4 effort estimation models. Results: We found 6 out of 9 linear combination rules never underperformed its base learners. No linear combination rule was superior to the others. Conclusion: No definitive rule was found while some linear combination rules can give competitive or better estimates than its base learners.