结合进化和深度强化学习的策略搜索研究综述

Olivier Sigaud
{"title":"结合进化和深度强化学习的策略搜索研究综述","authors":"Olivier Sigaud","doi":"10.1145/3569096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep neuroevolution and deep Reinforcement Learning have received a lot of attention over the past few years. Some works have compared them, highlighting their pros and cons, but an emerging trend combines them so as to benefit from the best of both worlds. In this article, we provide a survey of this emerging trend by organizing the literature into related groups of works and casting all the existing combinations in each group into a generic framework. We systematically cover all easily available papers irrespective of their publication status, focusing on the combination mechanisms rather than on the experimental results. In total, we cover 45 algorithms more recent than 2017. We hope this effort will favor the growth of the domain by facilitating the understanding of the relationships between the methods, leading to deeper analyses, outlining missing useful comparisons and suggesting new combinations of mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":220659,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining Evolution and Deep Reinforcement Learning for Policy Search: A Survey\",\"authors\":\"Olivier Sigaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3569096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deep neuroevolution and deep Reinforcement Learning have received a lot of attention over the past few years. Some works have compared them, highlighting their pros and cons, but an emerging trend combines them so as to benefit from the best of both worlds. In this article, we provide a survey of this emerging trend by organizing the literature into related groups of works and casting all the existing combinations in each group into a generic framework. We systematically cover all easily available papers irrespective of their publication status, focusing on the combination mechanisms rather than on the experimental results. In total, we cover 45 algorithms more recent than 2017. We hope this effort will favor the growth of the domain by facilitating the understanding of the relationships between the methods, leading to deeper analyses, outlining missing useful comparisons and suggesting new combinations of mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3569096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3569096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

在过去的几年里,深度神经进化和深度强化学习受到了很多关注。一些作品比较了它们,突出了它们的优点和缺点,但一种新兴的趋势将它们结合起来,以便从两个世界的优点中获益。在本文中,我们通过将文献组织成相关的作品组,并将每组中的所有现有组合铸造成一个通用框架,对这一新兴趋势进行了调查。我们系统地涵盖了所有容易获得的论文,无论其发表状态如何,重点关注组合机制而不是实验结果。我们总共涵盖了2017年之后的45种算法。我们希望通过促进对方法之间关系的理解,从而促进该领域的发展,从而进行更深入的分析,概述缺失的有用比较并提出新的机制组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combining Evolution and Deep Reinforcement Learning for Policy Search: A Survey
Deep neuroevolution and deep Reinforcement Learning have received a lot of attention over the past few years. Some works have compared them, highlighting their pros and cons, but an emerging trend combines them so as to benefit from the best of both worlds. In this article, we provide a survey of this emerging trend by organizing the literature into related groups of works and casting all the existing combinations in each group into a generic framework. We systematically cover all easily available papers irrespective of their publication status, focusing on the combination mechanisms rather than on the experimental results. In total, we cover 45 algorithms more recent than 2017. We hope this effort will favor the growth of the domain by facilitating the understanding of the relationships between the methods, leading to deeper analyses, outlining missing useful comparisons and suggesting new combinations of mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信