金融部门的伦理观点

Ligia Catherine Arias-Barrera
{"title":"金融部门的伦理观点","authors":"Ligia Catherine Arias-Barrera","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3018242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years misconduct issues have often arisen across markets and systematically important banks. As a result, there has been a notorious and exacerbated crisis of public confidence in the financial sector. It causes customers of financial services to be deterred from using the system and thus compounding the problem of stability even further. Hence, policymakers and supervisors are called upon re-thinking priorities when regulating financial business, turning to areas such as culture, conduct, integrity, and ethics, as means to guarantee the integrity of the entire financial industry. Traditionally, it has been argued that the key element to rule conduct in the financial sector is the coordination between macro and micro prudential policies, aiming at restoring public confidence and protecting market stability. The proposition is that today’s micro-prudential regulation, which is focused on individual institutions and instruments, must be strengthened and supplemented by macro-prudential regulation of the financial system. The reason is that macro-prudential regulation recognises the risks to the entire financial system, and seeks to fix the mismatch between risk-taking and risk capacity within firms, specially the highly interconnected firms. This paper proposes that such integration between macro and micro-prudential policies is complemented by means of designing and implementing a coherent risk-based approach to regulation and supervision that lies on three areas: i. comprehends the multiple dimensions of conduct risk and how it is perceived by regulators and regulated firms and individuals, ii. considers the psychological elements of the decision making process, and how human judgements about risks are affected by external factors, and iii. the two previous elements contribute to build a concept of “conduct risk” and how it could be better managed by prioritising conduct of business rules, as one of the pillars of the risk-based approach to regulation. The argument put forward here is that risk-based regimes facilitate the identification, management and mitigation of conduct risk in financial markets. Conduct risk defined as a type of operational risk that involves the actions and omissions of financial institutions and individuals within, regarded as misconduct, unethical and corrupt practices.","PeriodicalId":403916,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Finance (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical Perspective of the Financial Sector\",\"authors\":\"Ligia Catherine Arias-Barrera\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3018242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years misconduct issues have often arisen across markets and systematically important banks. As a result, there has been a notorious and exacerbated crisis of public confidence in the financial sector. It causes customers of financial services to be deterred from using the system and thus compounding the problem of stability even further. Hence, policymakers and supervisors are called upon re-thinking priorities when regulating financial business, turning to areas such as culture, conduct, integrity, and ethics, as means to guarantee the integrity of the entire financial industry. Traditionally, it has been argued that the key element to rule conduct in the financial sector is the coordination between macro and micro prudential policies, aiming at restoring public confidence and protecting market stability. The proposition is that today’s micro-prudential regulation, which is focused on individual institutions and instruments, must be strengthened and supplemented by macro-prudential regulation of the financial system. The reason is that macro-prudential regulation recognises the risks to the entire financial system, and seeks to fix the mismatch between risk-taking and risk capacity within firms, specially the highly interconnected firms. This paper proposes that such integration between macro and micro-prudential policies is complemented by means of designing and implementing a coherent risk-based approach to regulation and supervision that lies on three areas: i. comprehends the multiple dimensions of conduct risk and how it is perceived by regulators and regulated firms and individuals, ii. considers the psychological elements of the decision making process, and how human judgements about risks are affected by external factors, and iii. the two previous elements contribute to build a concept of “conduct risk” and how it could be better managed by prioritising conduct of business rules, as one of the pillars of the risk-based approach to regulation. The argument put forward here is that risk-based regimes facilitate the identification, management and mitigation of conduct risk in financial markets. Conduct risk defined as a type of operational risk that involves the actions and omissions of financial institutions and individuals within, regarded as misconduct, unethical and corrupt practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Finance (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Finance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3018242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3018242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,不当行为问题经常出现在各个市场和具有系统重要性的银行之间。其结果是,公众对金融部门的信心危机臭名昭著,而且愈演愈烈。它导致金融服务客户不敢使用该系统,从而进一步加剧了稳定性问题。因此,政策制定者和监管者在监管金融业务时需要重新思考优先事项,转向文化、行为、诚信和道德等领域,作为保障整个金融行业诚信的手段。传统上,人们一直认为,规范金融部门行为的关键因素是宏观和微观审慎政策之间的协调,旨在恢复公众信心和保护市场稳定。其主张是,当前针对个别机构和工具的微观审慎监管必须得到加强,并辅以对金融体系的宏观审慎监管。原因在于,宏观审慎监管认识到了整个金融体系面临的风险,并寻求解决企业(尤其是高度相互关联的企业)内部风险承担与风险能力之间的不匹配问题。本文提出,宏观和微观审慎政策之间的这种整合是通过设计和实施一种连贯的基于风险的监管和监督方法来补充的,这种方法取决于三个方面:1 .理解行为风险的多个维度,以及监管机构和被监管的公司和个人如何看待它;考虑决策过程中的心理因素,以及人类对风险的判断如何受到外部因素的影响。前两个要素有助于建立“行为风险”的概念,以及如何通过优先考虑商业规则的行为来更好地管理它,作为基于风险的监管方法的支柱之一。本文提出的论点是,基于风险的制度有助于识别、管理和减轻金融市场中的行为风险。行为风险被定义为一种操作风险,涉及金融机构和个人的行为和不作为,被视为不当行为、不道德和腐败行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical Perspective of the Financial Sector
In recent years misconduct issues have often arisen across markets and systematically important banks. As a result, there has been a notorious and exacerbated crisis of public confidence in the financial sector. It causes customers of financial services to be deterred from using the system and thus compounding the problem of stability even further. Hence, policymakers and supervisors are called upon re-thinking priorities when regulating financial business, turning to areas such as culture, conduct, integrity, and ethics, as means to guarantee the integrity of the entire financial industry. Traditionally, it has been argued that the key element to rule conduct in the financial sector is the coordination between macro and micro prudential policies, aiming at restoring public confidence and protecting market stability. The proposition is that today’s micro-prudential regulation, which is focused on individual institutions and instruments, must be strengthened and supplemented by macro-prudential regulation of the financial system. The reason is that macro-prudential regulation recognises the risks to the entire financial system, and seeks to fix the mismatch between risk-taking and risk capacity within firms, specially the highly interconnected firms. This paper proposes that such integration between macro and micro-prudential policies is complemented by means of designing and implementing a coherent risk-based approach to regulation and supervision that lies on three areas: i. comprehends the multiple dimensions of conduct risk and how it is perceived by regulators and regulated firms and individuals, ii. considers the psychological elements of the decision making process, and how human judgements about risks are affected by external factors, and iii. the two previous elements contribute to build a concept of “conduct risk” and how it could be better managed by prioritising conduct of business rules, as one of the pillars of the risk-based approach to regulation. The argument put forward here is that risk-based regimes facilitate the identification, management and mitigation of conduct risk in financial markets. Conduct risk defined as a type of operational risk that involves the actions and omissions of financial institutions and individuals within, regarded as misconduct, unethical and corrupt practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信