美国蜱虫大小试验

B. Rindi, Ingrid M. Werner
{"title":"美国蜱虫大小试验","authors":"B. Rindi, Ingrid M. Werner","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3041644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. equity markets are currently conducting a pilot study of the effects of a larger tick size on market quality and on the rewards for liquidity provision. We show that the larger tick size causes quoted and effective spreads, but also depth, to increase. This raises the cost for retail-sized liquidity demanding orders by almost fifty percent. However, average trade size increases, suggesting that institutions may benefit from the deeper quotes. The larger tick size translates into forty percent higher profits to liquidity providers despite larger price impacts. We attribute these changes mainly to the changes in tick size for displayed quotes, while there are modest or no effects of requiring all trades to execute on a coarser price grid. Moreover, the bulk of the effects occur for tick-constrained stocks which trading costs more than double. By contrast, trading costs for unconstrained stocks decline by more than ten percent. Finally, we document significant spillovers to stocks with unchanged tick size. Our evidence suggests that some market makers left stocks trading in decimals for the more lucrative pilot stocks, and that the reduced competition causes quoted spreads and rewards for liquidity provision to increase also for stocks trading in decimals.","PeriodicalId":166116,"journal":{"name":"Ohio State University","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"U.S. Tick Size Pilot\",\"authors\":\"B. Rindi, Ingrid M. Werner\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3041644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The U.S. equity markets are currently conducting a pilot study of the effects of a larger tick size on market quality and on the rewards for liquidity provision. We show that the larger tick size causes quoted and effective spreads, but also depth, to increase. This raises the cost for retail-sized liquidity demanding orders by almost fifty percent. However, average trade size increases, suggesting that institutions may benefit from the deeper quotes. The larger tick size translates into forty percent higher profits to liquidity providers despite larger price impacts. We attribute these changes mainly to the changes in tick size for displayed quotes, while there are modest or no effects of requiring all trades to execute on a coarser price grid. Moreover, the bulk of the effects occur for tick-constrained stocks which trading costs more than double. By contrast, trading costs for unconstrained stocks decline by more than ten percent. Finally, we document significant spillovers to stocks with unchanged tick size. Our evidence suggests that some market makers left stocks trading in decimals for the more lucrative pilot stocks, and that the reduced competition causes quoted spreads and rewards for liquidity provision to increase also for stocks trading in decimals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ohio State University\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ohio State University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3041644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ohio State University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3041644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

美国股市目前正在进行一项试点研究,研究更大的波动幅度对市场质量和流动性提供回报的影响。我们表明,较大的刻度大小导致报价和有效点差,以及深度,增加。这将零售规模的流动性需求订单的成本提高了近50%。然而,平均交易规模增加了,这表明机构可能会从更深的报价中受益。虽然对价格的影响更大,但更大的波动幅度意味着流动性提供商的利润将增加40%。我们将这些变化主要归因于显示报价的刻度大小的变化,而要求所有交易在较粗的价格网格上执行的影响不大或没有影响。此外,大部分影响发生在交易成本翻倍以上的股票上。相比之下,无约束股票的交易成本下降了10%以上。最后,我们记录了对蜱大小不变的股票的显著溢出效应。我们的证据表明,一些做市商放弃了以小数交易的股票,转而选择利润更丰厚的试点股票,而竞争的减少导致以小数交易的股票的报价价差和流动性提供的奖励也增加了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
U.S. Tick Size Pilot
The U.S. equity markets are currently conducting a pilot study of the effects of a larger tick size on market quality and on the rewards for liquidity provision. We show that the larger tick size causes quoted and effective spreads, but also depth, to increase. This raises the cost for retail-sized liquidity demanding orders by almost fifty percent. However, average trade size increases, suggesting that institutions may benefit from the deeper quotes. The larger tick size translates into forty percent higher profits to liquidity providers despite larger price impacts. We attribute these changes mainly to the changes in tick size for displayed quotes, while there are modest or no effects of requiring all trades to execute on a coarser price grid. Moreover, the bulk of the effects occur for tick-constrained stocks which trading costs more than double. By contrast, trading costs for unconstrained stocks decline by more than ten percent. Finally, we document significant spillovers to stocks with unchanged tick size. Our evidence suggests that some market makers left stocks trading in decimals for the more lucrative pilot stocks, and that the reduced competition causes quoted spreads and rewards for liquidity provision to increase also for stocks trading in decimals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信