{"title":"《金融服务管理局条例(09/POJK.04/2015)颁布后对回购协议(REPO)买方的保护","authors":"Benedictus Hardyanto","doi":"10.22304/pjih.v6n1.a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to find out the Repurchase Agreement (REPO) buyers’ protection in the capital market, after the issuance of the Regulation of the Financial Services Authority Number 09/POJK.04/2015 on the Guidelines for Financial Services Institutions Repurchase Agreement Transactions (POJK REPO). REPO transaction is initially considered as loan transaction and lending securities instrument between two parties based on an agreement. Then, on a predetermined date, the same return on securities will be given at the agreed price. However, after the issuance of the POJK REPO, the REPO transaction qualifies as a sale and purchase transaction with a repurchase agreement. As a result, the initial understanding that REPO is a loan and lending transaction is no longer valid. In the Global Master Indonesia Repurchase Agreement (GMRA Indonesia), the REPO seller’s responsibility is unclear when the value of the securities held by the REPO Buyer Party cannot fulfill the value that must be paid by the Seller on the repurchase date. Therefore, despite the fact that Indonesia has had REPO transaction guidelines, the GMRA Indonesia as mandated by the Financial Services Authority Number 9/POJK.04/2015, the responsibility of the REPO Seller has not been regulated explicitly.","PeriodicalId":404335,"journal":{"name":"PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repurchase Agreement (REPO) Buyers’ Protection after the Issuance of the Regulation of the Financial Services Authority Number 09/POJK.04/2015\",\"authors\":\"Benedictus Hardyanto\",\"doi\":\"10.22304/pjih.v6n1.a6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to find out the Repurchase Agreement (REPO) buyers’ protection in the capital market, after the issuance of the Regulation of the Financial Services Authority Number 09/POJK.04/2015 on the Guidelines for Financial Services Institutions Repurchase Agreement Transactions (POJK REPO). REPO transaction is initially considered as loan transaction and lending securities instrument between two parties based on an agreement. Then, on a predetermined date, the same return on securities will be given at the agreed price. However, after the issuance of the POJK REPO, the REPO transaction qualifies as a sale and purchase transaction with a repurchase agreement. As a result, the initial understanding that REPO is a loan and lending transaction is no longer valid. In the Global Master Indonesia Repurchase Agreement (GMRA Indonesia), the REPO seller’s responsibility is unclear when the value of the securities held by the REPO Buyer Party cannot fulfill the value that must be paid by the Seller on the repurchase date. Therefore, despite the fact that Indonesia has had REPO transaction guidelines, the GMRA Indonesia as mandated by the Financial Services Authority Number 9/POJK.04/2015, the responsibility of the REPO Seller has not been regulated explicitly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v6n1.a6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v6n1.a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文旨在研究金融服务管理局第09/POJK号条例颁布后,资本市场上回购协议(REPO)买方的保护问题。《金融服务机构回购协议交易指引》(POJK REPO)回购交易最初被认为是双方之间基于协议的贷款交易和借贷证券工具。然后,在预定的日期,同样的证券回报将以商定的价格给出。然而,在POJK REPO发行后,REPO交易就有资格作为带有回购协议的买卖交易。因此,最初认为回购是一种贷款和借贷交易的理解不再有效。在Global Master Indonesia Repurchase Agreement (GMRA Indonesia)中,当回购买方所持有的证券价值无法满足卖方在回购日必须支付的价值时,回购卖方的责任是不明确的。因此,尽管印度尼西亚有回购交易指导方针,但GMRA印度尼西亚是由金融服务管理局9/POJK授权的。4/2015,回购卖方的责任没有明确规定。
Repurchase Agreement (REPO) Buyers’ Protection after the Issuance of the Regulation of the Financial Services Authority Number 09/POJK.04/2015
This paper aims to find out the Repurchase Agreement (REPO) buyers’ protection in the capital market, after the issuance of the Regulation of the Financial Services Authority Number 09/POJK.04/2015 on the Guidelines for Financial Services Institutions Repurchase Agreement Transactions (POJK REPO). REPO transaction is initially considered as loan transaction and lending securities instrument between two parties based on an agreement. Then, on a predetermined date, the same return on securities will be given at the agreed price. However, after the issuance of the POJK REPO, the REPO transaction qualifies as a sale and purchase transaction with a repurchase agreement. As a result, the initial understanding that REPO is a loan and lending transaction is no longer valid. In the Global Master Indonesia Repurchase Agreement (GMRA Indonesia), the REPO seller’s responsibility is unclear when the value of the securities held by the REPO Buyer Party cannot fulfill the value that must be paid by the Seller on the repurchase date. Therefore, despite the fact that Indonesia has had REPO transaction guidelines, the GMRA Indonesia as mandated by the Financial Services Authority Number 9/POJK.04/2015, the responsibility of the REPO Seller has not been regulated explicitly.