逻辑学与早期基督教

J. Dagys
{"title":"逻辑学与早期基督教","authors":"J. Dagys","doi":"10.17846/pc.2020.6.2.72-78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper considers the relation of early Christianity to the history of logic, that is, the role of the early Christianity in the development of logic as a discipline. In effect, two questions are raised: First, what was the attitude of the early Christian writers towards logic and dialectics? And second, how does the period and whatever could be found there relate to the subsequent development of logic? The suggested conclusion is that the enmity of early Christians to logic can be explained by the divergent standards of truth: revealed and non-intellectualist nature of its central doctrines, also by the association of logical matters with pagan philosophy. On the other hand the period seems to have laid the grounds for the subsequent rediscovery of internal need for the standardized criterion of truth, and so the resultant establishment of logic as an important discipline, and thus this period is essential for understanding the subsequent flow of the history of logic. Hence the gap in the history lurking between pagan Antiquity and Boethius can reasonably be filled.","PeriodicalId":166511,"journal":{"name":"Philosophica Critica","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Logic and Early Christianity\",\"authors\":\"J. Dagys\",\"doi\":\"10.17846/pc.2020.6.2.72-78\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper considers the relation of early Christianity to the history of logic, that is, the role of the early Christianity in the development of logic as a discipline. In effect, two questions are raised: First, what was the attitude of the early Christian writers towards logic and dialectics? And second, how does the period and whatever could be found there relate to the subsequent development of logic? The suggested conclusion is that the enmity of early Christians to logic can be explained by the divergent standards of truth: revealed and non-intellectualist nature of its central doctrines, also by the association of logical matters with pagan philosophy. On the other hand the period seems to have laid the grounds for the subsequent rediscovery of internal need for the standardized criterion of truth, and so the resultant establishment of logic as an important discipline, and thus this period is essential for understanding the subsequent flow of the history of logic. Hence the gap in the history lurking between pagan Antiquity and Boethius can reasonably be filled.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophica Critica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophica Critica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17846/pc.2020.6.2.72-78\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophica Critica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17846/pc.2020.6.2.72-78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了早期基督教与逻辑学历史的关系,即早期基督教在逻辑学学科发展中的作用。实际上,提出了两个问题:第一,早期基督教作家对逻辑和辩证法的态度是什么?第二,这个时期和任何可以发现的东西与逻辑学的后续发展有什么关系?建议的结论是,早期基督徒对逻辑的敌意可以用真理的不同标准来解释:其中心教义的揭示和非智性,也可以用逻辑问题与异教哲学的联系来解释。另一方面,这一时期似乎为后来重新发现对真理标准的内在需要奠定了基础,从而使逻辑学确立为一门重要的学科,因此,这一时期对于理解逻辑学后来的历史进程是必不可少的。因此,潜伏在异教古代和波伊提乌之间的历史空白可以合理地填补。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Logic and Early Christianity
The paper considers the relation of early Christianity to the history of logic, that is, the role of the early Christianity in the development of logic as a discipline. In effect, two questions are raised: First, what was the attitude of the early Christian writers towards logic and dialectics? And second, how does the period and whatever could be found there relate to the subsequent development of logic? The suggested conclusion is that the enmity of early Christians to logic can be explained by the divergent standards of truth: revealed and non-intellectualist nature of its central doctrines, also by the association of logical matters with pagan philosophy. On the other hand the period seems to have laid the grounds for the subsequent rediscovery of internal need for the standardized criterion of truth, and so the resultant establishment of logic as an important discipline, and thus this period is essential for understanding the subsequent flow of the history of logic. Hence the gap in the history lurking between pagan Antiquity and Boethius can reasonably be filled.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信