综合行为卫生保健的临床、操作和财务评估实践。

Amelia R Muse, A. Lamson, Katherine W Didericksen, Jennifer L. Hodgson, A. Schoemann
{"title":"综合行为卫生保健的临床、操作和财务评估实践。","authors":"Amelia R Muse, A. Lamson, Katherine W Didericksen, Jennifer L. Hodgson, A. Schoemann","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nIntegrated behavioral health care is an important pathway to providing whole person care. It is delivered through a transdisciplinary lens and team and funded through complex policies, billing codes, and systems. While the clinical practice of integrated behavioral health care has received attention in the research, less is known about how health care systems demonstrate and evaluate the utility, effectiveness, impact, and longevity of integrating behavioral health into primary care.\n\n\nMETHOD\nHealth care professionals (N = 145) working in integrated settings were recruited to participate in a metaevaluation about their evaluation practices. Descriptive and regression analyses were used to summarize and evaluate findings on clinical, operational, and financial evaluation practices.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThere were a variety of types of evaluation practices across the national sample, as well as understanding across professional roles. Findings from the survey, which included primary care providers, behavioral health clinicians, and administrators working in integrated care settings confirmed that there was a lack of knowledge about evaluation and resources necessary to engage in the evaluation of clinical, operational, and financial outcomes. Furthermore, administrators were more likely to know about evaluation practices compared to medical providers and behavioral health providers. The survey also highlighted that organizational barriers to implementing integrated care were an issue across programs.\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nUtilizing clinical, operational, and financial evaluation together provide a more comprehensive review of the implementation integrated behavioral health. Real-world implementers and evaluators should consider forming integrated and inclusive evaluation teams, including administrators, medical providers, behavioral health clinicians, patients, and families. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":358476,"journal":{"name":"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical, operational, and financial evaluation practices in integrated behavioral health care.\",\"authors\":\"Amelia R Muse, A. Lamson, Katherine W Didericksen, Jennifer L. Hodgson, A. Schoemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/fsh0000683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nIntegrated behavioral health care is an important pathway to providing whole person care. It is delivered through a transdisciplinary lens and team and funded through complex policies, billing codes, and systems. While the clinical practice of integrated behavioral health care has received attention in the research, less is known about how health care systems demonstrate and evaluate the utility, effectiveness, impact, and longevity of integrating behavioral health into primary care.\\n\\n\\nMETHOD\\nHealth care professionals (N = 145) working in integrated settings were recruited to participate in a metaevaluation about their evaluation practices. Descriptive and regression analyses were used to summarize and evaluate findings on clinical, operational, and financial evaluation practices.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThere were a variety of types of evaluation practices across the national sample, as well as understanding across professional roles. Findings from the survey, which included primary care providers, behavioral health clinicians, and administrators working in integrated care settings confirmed that there was a lack of knowledge about evaluation and resources necessary to engage in the evaluation of clinical, operational, and financial outcomes. Furthermore, administrators were more likely to know about evaluation practices compared to medical providers and behavioral health providers. The survey also highlighted that organizational barriers to implementing integrated care were an issue across programs.\\n\\n\\nDISCUSSION\\nUtilizing clinical, operational, and financial evaluation together provide a more comprehensive review of the implementation integrated behavioral health. Real-world implementers and evaluators should consider forming integrated and inclusive evaluation teams, including administrators, medical providers, behavioral health clinicians, patients, and families. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":358476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

综合行为保健是提供全人保健的重要途径。它通过跨学科的视角和团队交付,并通过复杂的政策、账单代码和系统提供资金。虽然综合行为卫生保健的临床实践在研究中得到了关注,但对于卫生保健系统如何证明和评估将行为卫生纳入初级保健的效用、有效性、影响和寿命,人们知之甚少。方法招募145名在综合环境中工作的卫生保健专业人员,对他们的评价实践进行meta评价。描述性和回归分析用于总结和评估临床、操作和财务评估实践的发现。结果:在全国样本中有各种类型的评估实践,以及跨专业角色的理解。调查结果包括初级保健提供者、行为健康临床医生和在综合护理环境中工作的管理人员,调查结果证实,缺乏对临床、操作和财务结果进行评估所必需的评估知识和资源。此外,与医疗提供者和行为健康提供者相比,管理人员更有可能了解评估实践。调查还强调,实施综合护理的组织障碍是跨项目的一个问题。利用临床、操作和财务评估一起提供了对综合行为健康实施的更全面的审查。现实世界的实施者和评估者应该考虑组成综合的、包容的评估团队,包括管理者、医疗提供者、行为健康临床医生、患者和家庭。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical, operational, and financial evaluation practices in integrated behavioral health care.
INTRODUCTION Integrated behavioral health care is an important pathway to providing whole person care. It is delivered through a transdisciplinary lens and team and funded through complex policies, billing codes, and systems. While the clinical practice of integrated behavioral health care has received attention in the research, less is known about how health care systems demonstrate and evaluate the utility, effectiveness, impact, and longevity of integrating behavioral health into primary care. METHOD Health care professionals (N = 145) working in integrated settings were recruited to participate in a metaevaluation about their evaluation practices. Descriptive and regression analyses were used to summarize and evaluate findings on clinical, operational, and financial evaluation practices. RESULTS There were a variety of types of evaluation practices across the national sample, as well as understanding across professional roles. Findings from the survey, which included primary care providers, behavioral health clinicians, and administrators working in integrated care settings confirmed that there was a lack of knowledge about evaluation and resources necessary to engage in the evaluation of clinical, operational, and financial outcomes. Furthermore, administrators were more likely to know about evaluation practices compared to medical providers and behavioral health providers. The survey also highlighted that organizational barriers to implementing integrated care were an issue across programs. DISCUSSION Utilizing clinical, operational, and financial evaluation together provide a more comprehensive review of the implementation integrated behavioral health. Real-world implementers and evaluators should consider forming integrated and inclusive evaluation teams, including administrators, medical providers, behavioral health clinicians, patients, and families. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信