{"title":"特征检测器在人体活动识别中的比较研究","authors":"Amira Ali Bebars, E. Hemayed","doi":"10.1109/ICENCO.2013.6736470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper quantifies existing techniques for feature detection in human action recognition. Four different feature detection approaches are investigated using Motion SIFT descriptor, a standard bag-of-features SVM classifier with x2 kernel. Specifically we used two popular feature detectors; Motion SIFT (MOSIFT) and Motion FAST (MOFAST) with and without Statis interest points. The system was tested on commonly used datasets; KTH and Weizmann. Based on several experiments we conclude that using MOSIFT detector with Statis interest point results in the best classification accuracy on Weizmann dataset but MOFAST without Statis points achieve the best classification accuracy on KTH dataset.","PeriodicalId":256564,"journal":{"name":"2013 9th International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study for feature detectors in human activity recognition\",\"authors\":\"Amira Ali Bebars, E. Hemayed\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICENCO.2013.6736470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper quantifies existing techniques for feature detection in human action recognition. Four different feature detection approaches are investigated using Motion SIFT descriptor, a standard bag-of-features SVM classifier with x2 kernel. Specifically we used two popular feature detectors; Motion SIFT (MOSIFT) and Motion FAST (MOFAST) with and without Statis interest points. The system was tested on commonly used datasets; KTH and Weizmann. Based on several experiments we conclude that using MOSIFT detector with Statis interest point results in the best classification accuracy on Weizmann dataset but MOFAST without Statis points achieve the best classification accuracy on KTH dataset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 9th International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 9th International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICENCO.2013.6736470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 9th International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICENCO.2013.6736470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative study for feature detectors in human activity recognition
This paper quantifies existing techniques for feature detection in human action recognition. Four different feature detection approaches are investigated using Motion SIFT descriptor, a standard bag-of-features SVM classifier with x2 kernel. Specifically we used two popular feature detectors; Motion SIFT (MOSIFT) and Motion FAST (MOFAST) with and without Statis interest points. The system was tested on commonly used datasets; KTH and Weizmann. Based on several experiments we conclude that using MOSIFT detector with Statis interest point results in the best classification accuracy on Weizmann dataset but MOFAST without Statis points achieve the best classification accuracy on KTH dataset.