最大熵框架在文本分类中的应用

Hui Wang, Lin Wang, Lixia Yi
{"title":"最大熵框架在文本分类中的应用","authors":"Hui Wang, Lin Wang, Lixia Yi","doi":"10.1109/ICICISYS.2010.5658639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, Maximum Entropy (ME) framework is used to classify text documents. The ME framework has a lot of advantages when compared with other supervised learning algorithms, such as naive Bayes classifier. For example, it makes no inherent conditional independence assumptions between terms. With four labeled data sets, extensive experiments are made to compare the accuracy of ME algorithm with those of naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine (SVM), which are two popular and accurate algorithms in the domain of text classification. The final result is that ME method consistently outperforms naive Bayes and SVM algorithms in accuracy. On the WebKB and Industry Vector data sets, the accuracy of ME algorithm increases from 81.38% to 85.52% and from 85.73% to 89.78% respectively. On the third 20 Newsgroups data set, our experimental result is opposite to that of Nigam et al. For the last Reuters-21578 data set, the accuracy of ME algorithm increases from 94.76% to 96.16%.","PeriodicalId":339711,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maximum Entropy framework used in text classification\",\"authors\":\"Hui Wang, Lin Wang, Lixia Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICICISYS.2010.5658639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, Maximum Entropy (ME) framework is used to classify text documents. The ME framework has a lot of advantages when compared with other supervised learning algorithms, such as naive Bayes classifier. For example, it makes no inherent conditional independence assumptions between terms. With four labeled data sets, extensive experiments are made to compare the accuracy of ME algorithm with those of naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine (SVM), which are two popular and accurate algorithms in the domain of text classification. The final result is that ME method consistently outperforms naive Bayes and SVM algorithms in accuracy. On the WebKB and Industry Vector data sets, the accuracy of ME algorithm increases from 81.38% to 85.52% and from 85.73% to 89.78% respectively. On the third 20 Newsgroups data set, our experimental result is opposite to that of Nigam et al. For the last Reuters-21578 data set, the accuracy of ME algorithm increases from 94.76% to 96.16%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICISYS.2010.5658639\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICISYS.2010.5658639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

本文采用最大熵框架对文本文档进行分类。与其他监督学习算法(如朴素贝叶斯分类器)相比,该框架具有许多优点。例如,它在项之间没有固有的条件独立性假设。在4个标记数据集上进行了大量的实验,比较了ME算法与朴素贝叶斯和支持向量机(SVM)算法的准确率,这两种算法是文本分类领域中比较流行和准确的算法。最终结果表明,该方法在准确率上始终优于朴素贝叶斯和支持向量机算法。在WebKB和Industry Vector数据集上,ME算法的准确率分别从81.38%提高到85.52%和85.73%提高到89.78%。在第三个20个新闻组数据集上,我们的实验结果与Nigam等人的相反。对于最后一个Reuters-21578数据集,ME算法的准确率从94.76%提高到96.16%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maximum Entropy framework used in text classification
In this paper, Maximum Entropy (ME) framework is used to classify text documents. The ME framework has a lot of advantages when compared with other supervised learning algorithms, such as naive Bayes classifier. For example, it makes no inherent conditional independence assumptions between terms. With four labeled data sets, extensive experiments are made to compare the accuracy of ME algorithm with those of naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine (SVM), which are two popular and accurate algorithms in the domain of text classification. The final result is that ME method consistently outperforms naive Bayes and SVM algorithms in accuracy. On the WebKB and Industry Vector data sets, the accuracy of ME algorithm increases from 81.38% to 85.52% and from 85.73% to 89.78% respectively. On the third 20 Newsgroups data set, our experimental result is opposite to that of Nigam et al. For the last Reuters-21578 data set, the accuracy of ME algorithm increases from 94.76% to 96.16%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信