不适的反射性

Alison Baker, Amy F. Quayle, Lutfiye Ali
{"title":"不适的反射性","authors":"Alison Baker, Amy F. Quayle, Lutfiye Ali","doi":"10.1163/9789004381407_012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With a shared disciplinary background in psychology, our research focuses on issues of power, identity making, and social relations across differences arising from lines of race, class and gender. In this chapter, we reflect on power, positionality, and processes of knowledge production in our research in and with communities. The 'crisis of representation' in qualitative research has been well rehearsed, as is the push for researchers to account for their role in knowledge production through reflexivity. Yet as Wanda Pillow (2003) warns, there is a danger that self-reflexivity can become a reductionist, comfortable exercise that brings the promise of release from \"tension, voyeurism, ethnocentrism - a release from your discomfort with representation through a transcendent clarity\" (p. 186). In this chapter, we explore reflexivities of discomfort, which Pillow (2003) described as \"a positioning of reflexivity not as clarity, honesty, or humility, but as practice of confounding disruptions\" (p. 192). We seek to highlight the messiness of engaged qualitative community based research by focusing on particular moments of disruption, which prompted reflexivity within discomfort. These moments of disruption provide insight into dynamics of power and privilege and the affective component of our work. We first discuss our shared concern with interrogating the circuits of dispossession and privilege (Fine & Ruglis, 2009) in post-colonising Australia. We then describe our approach to placing and 'working through' discomfort.","PeriodicalId":426883,"journal":{"name":"Places of Privilege","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflexivities of Discomfort\",\"authors\":\"Alison Baker, Amy F. Quayle, Lutfiye Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004381407_012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With a shared disciplinary background in psychology, our research focuses on issues of power, identity making, and social relations across differences arising from lines of race, class and gender. In this chapter, we reflect on power, positionality, and processes of knowledge production in our research in and with communities. The 'crisis of representation' in qualitative research has been well rehearsed, as is the push for researchers to account for their role in knowledge production through reflexivity. Yet as Wanda Pillow (2003) warns, there is a danger that self-reflexivity can become a reductionist, comfortable exercise that brings the promise of release from \\\"tension, voyeurism, ethnocentrism - a release from your discomfort with representation through a transcendent clarity\\\" (p. 186). In this chapter, we explore reflexivities of discomfort, which Pillow (2003) described as \\\"a positioning of reflexivity not as clarity, honesty, or humility, but as practice of confounding disruptions\\\" (p. 192). We seek to highlight the messiness of engaged qualitative community based research by focusing on particular moments of disruption, which prompted reflexivity within discomfort. These moments of disruption provide insight into dynamics of power and privilege and the affective component of our work. We first discuss our shared concern with interrogating the circuits of dispossession and privilege (Fine & Ruglis, 2009) in post-colonising Australia. We then describe our approach to placing and 'working through' discomfort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Places of Privilege\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Places of Privilege\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004381407_012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Places of Privilege","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004381407_012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们在心理学方面有着共同的学科背景,我们的研究重点是权力、身份塑造和跨越种族、阶级和性别差异的社会关系问题。在本章中,我们在社区内和与社区合作的研究中反思了权力、定位和知识生产过程。定性研究中的“表征危机”已经被很好地排练过了,就像推动研究人员通过反身性来解释他们在知识生产中的角色一样。然而,正如Wanda Pillow(2003)所警告的那样,有一种危险是,自我反思可以成为一种简化的、舒适的练习,它带来了从“紧张、窥淫癖、种族中心主义”中解脱出来的承诺——通过一种超越的清晰,从你对表现的不适中解脱出来”(第186页)。在本章中,我们探讨不适的反射性,Pillow(2003)将其描述为“一种对反射性的定位,不是清晰、诚实或谦卑,而是混淆干扰的实践”(第192页)。我们试图通过关注中断的特定时刻来强调从事定性社区研究的混乱性,这促使了不适中的反射性。这些颠覆性的时刻让我们洞察到权力和特权的动态,以及我们工作中的情感成分。我们首先讨论了我们对后殖民时期澳大利亚的剥夺和特权循环的共同关注(Fine & Ruglis, 2009)。然后,我们描述了我们放置和“克服”不适的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflexivities of Discomfort
With a shared disciplinary background in psychology, our research focuses on issues of power, identity making, and social relations across differences arising from lines of race, class and gender. In this chapter, we reflect on power, positionality, and processes of knowledge production in our research in and with communities. The 'crisis of representation' in qualitative research has been well rehearsed, as is the push for researchers to account for their role in knowledge production through reflexivity. Yet as Wanda Pillow (2003) warns, there is a danger that self-reflexivity can become a reductionist, comfortable exercise that brings the promise of release from "tension, voyeurism, ethnocentrism - a release from your discomfort with representation through a transcendent clarity" (p. 186). In this chapter, we explore reflexivities of discomfort, which Pillow (2003) described as "a positioning of reflexivity not as clarity, honesty, or humility, but as practice of confounding disruptions" (p. 192). We seek to highlight the messiness of engaged qualitative community based research by focusing on particular moments of disruption, which prompted reflexivity within discomfort. These moments of disruption provide insight into dynamics of power and privilege and the affective component of our work. We first discuss our shared concern with interrogating the circuits of dispossession and privilege (Fine & Ruglis, 2009) in post-colonising Australia. We then describe our approach to placing and 'working through' discomfort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信