医院住院患者诊断与行动规范不一致的未决理赔分析

Puguh Ika Listyorini, Nadia Arifah Ramadhan
{"title":"医院住院患者诊断与行动规范不一致的未决理赔分析","authors":"Puguh Ika Listyorini, Nadia Arifah Ramadhan","doi":"10.47701/icohetech.v3i1.2257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was conducted at UNS Sukoharjo Hospital. Based on the preliminary study, it was found that 19.5% of the claims filed were pending in inpatient claims and 31% were due to coding cases. This study was conducted to determine pending claims due to coding discrepancies in hospitalized National Health Insurance patients. \nThis is a case study research type with a qualitative research design. Data were taken by observation and interviews with the head of the medical record installation room, coding officer, head of the guarantee installation room, and the verifier of the Health Insurance Administration. The data collected, presented descriptively, and analyzed using content analysis techniques. \nThe results showed that the coding of claim files had been carried out according to hospital standards. Submission of the claim file is carried out after verification by the internal verifier. The pending claim occurs due to a mismatch in coding caused by the need for a join code, an error in determining the main diagnosis, the need for confirmation of the action code, and the need for confirmation of supporting reports. Other influencing factors are support from colleagues, technology support, limited knowledge, and lack of staff training, as well as system changes and problematic servers both from hospitals and from Health Insurance Providers. \nThe conclusion is that there are still pending claims caused by coding cases, so it is better for officers to take coding training and perform server maintenance.","PeriodicalId":415761,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding of International Conference on Science, Health, And Technology","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Pending Claims Due to Incompatibility of Diagnostic and Action Codes in Inpatients in Hospitals\",\"authors\":\"Puguh Ika Listyorini, Nadia Arifah Ramadhan\",\"doi\":\"10.47701/icohetech.v3i1.2257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research was conducted at UNS Sukoharjo Hospital. Based on the preliminary study, it was found that 19.5% of the claims filed were pending in inpatient claims and 31% were due to coding cases. This study was conducted to determine pending claims due to coding discrepancies in hospitalized National Health Insurance patients. \\nThis is a case study research type with a qualitative research design. Data were taken by observation and interviews with the head of the medical record installation room, coding officer, head of the guarantee installation room, and the verifier of the Health Insurance Administration. The data collected, presented descriptively, and analyzed using content analysis techniques. \\nThe results showed that the coding of claim files had been carried out according to hospital standards. Submission of the claim file is carried out after verification by the internal verifier. The pending claim occurs due to a mismatch in coding caused by the need for a join code, an error in determining the main diagnosis, the need for confirmation of the action code, and the need for confirmation of supporting reports. Other influencing factors are support from colleagues, technology support, limited knowledge, and lack of staff training, as well as system changes and problematic servers both from hospitals and from Health Insurance Providers. \\nThe conclusion is that there are still pending claims caused by coding cases, so it is better for officers to take coding training and perform server maintenance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceeding of International Conference on Science, Health, And Technology\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceeding of International Conference on Science, Health, And Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47701/icohetech.v3i1.2257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding of International Conference on Science, Health, And Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47701/icohetech.v3i1.2257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究是在UNS Sukoharjo医院进行的。根据初步研究,发现19.5%的索赔是住院索赔,31%是由于编码病例。摘要本研究旨在确定住院国民健康保险患者因编码差异而导致的未决索赔。这是一种采用定性研究设计的案例研究类型。通过对病案安装室负责人、编码员、保障安装室负责人、健康保险局审核员的观察和访谈获取数据。使用内容分析技术收集、描述和分析数据。结果表明,索赔文件编码已按医院标准进行。索赔文件的提交由内部审核员审核后进行。由于需要连接代码、确定主要诊断时出现错误、需要确认操作代码以及需要确认支持报告而导致的编码不匹配,从而发生未决索赔。其他影响因素包括来自同事的支持、技术支持、有限的知识和缺乏员工培训,以及来自医院和健康保险提供商的系统更改和有问题的服务器。得出的结论是,目前仍有编码案件导致的索赔悬而未决,因此警员最好接受编码培训并进行服务器维护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Pending Claims Due to Incompatibility of Diagnostic and Action Codes in Inpatients in Hospitals
This research was conducted at UNS Sukoharjo Hospital. Based on the preliminary study, it was found that 19.5% of the claims filed were pending in inpatient claims and 31% were due to coding cases. This study was conducted to determine pending claims due to coding discrepancies in hospitalized National Health Insurance patients. This is a case study research type with a qualitative research design. Data were taken by observation and interviews with the head of the medical record installation room, coding officer, head of the guarantee installation room, and the verifier of the Health Insurance Administration. The data collected, presented descriptively, and analyzed using content analysis techniques. The results showed that the coding of claim files had been carried out according to hospital standards. Submission of the claim file is carried out after verification by the internal verifier. The pending claim occurs due to a mismatch in coding caused by the need for a join code, an error in determining the main diagnosis, the need for confirmation of the action code, and the need for confirmation of supporting reports. Other influencing factors are support from colleagues, technology support, limited knowledge, and lack of staff training, as well as system changes and problematic servers both from hospitals and from Health Insurance Providers. The conclusion is that there are still pending claims caused by coding cases, so it is better for officers to take coding training and perform server maintenance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信