{"title":"中国大宗商品市场的风险溢价","authors":"Chaohua He, Cheng Jiang, Marat Molyboga","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2825109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates risk premia in Chinese commodity markets. We accomplish that by decomposing the returns of commodity futures into spot and term premia following Szymanowska, De Roon, Nijman and Van Den Goorbergh (2014). We find that a three factors model that includes equally-weighted market factor, carry and time-series momentum explains spot premia. The term premium, which represents a deviation from the expectation hypothesis, is weak, in contrast with the significant premium in the US commodity markets associated with the average t-statistic of 4.32 and explained by two investable factors that are derived using calendar spreads. We demonstrate that the term premia are not driven by liquidity and are negatively related to basis likely due to mean-reversion in basis.","PeriodicalId":103524,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Asia & South East Asia (Topic)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Premia in Chinese Commodity Markets\",\"authors\":\"Chaohua He, Cheng Jiang, Marat Molyboga\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2825109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates risk premia in Chinese commodity markets. We accomplish that by decomposing the returns of commodity futures into spot and term premia following Szymanowska, De Roon, Nijman and Van Den Goorbergh (2014). We find that a three factors model that includes equally-weighted market factor, carry and time-series momentum explains spot premia. The term premium, which represents a deviation from the expectation hypothesis, is weak, in contrast with the significant premium in the US commodity markets associated with the average t-statistic of 4.32 and explained by two investable factors that are derived using calendar spreads. We demonstrate that the term premia are not driven by liquidity and are negatively related to basis likely due to mean-reversion in basis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Asia & South East Asia (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Asia & South East Asia (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2825109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Asia & South East Asia (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2825109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
摘要
本文对中国商品市场的风险溢价进行了研究。我们按照Szymanowska、De Roon、Nijman和Van Den Goorbergh(2014)的方法,将商品期货的收益分解为现货和期限溢价。我们发现一个包含等权重市场因素、套利和时间序列动量的三因素模型解释了现货溢价。与美国大宗商品市场的显著溢价(与平均t统计量4.32相关,并由使用日历价差推导出的两个可投资因素解释)相比,代表偏离预期假设的期限溢价较弱。我们证明了期限溢价不是由流动性驱动的,并且可能由于基差的均值回归而与基差负相关。
This paper investigates risk premia in Chinese commodity markets. We accomplish that by decomposing the returns of commodity futures into spot and term premia following Szymanowska, De Roon, Nijman and Van Den Goorbergh (2014). We find that a three factors model that includes equally-weighted market factor, carry and time-series momentum explains spot premia. The term premium, which represents a deviation from the expectation hypothesis, is weak, in contrast with the significant premium in the US commodity markets associated with the average t-statistic of 4.32 and explained by two investable factors that are derived using calendar spreads. We demonstrate that the term premia are not driven by liquidity and are negatively related to basis likely due to mean-reversion in basis.