错误定罪的起诉责任

Jeffrey M. Peabody
{"title":"错误定罪的起诉责任","authors":"Jeffrey M. Peabody","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1130250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the problem of wrongful convictions with an aim towards developing a system for reducing the rate of wrongful convictions. Because current laws only seek to compensate exonerees for wrongful convictions, it is necessary to consider strategies for reducing the rate of wrongful convictions ex ante. Because prosecutors are the principal agents capable of reducing wrongful convictions, this paper suggests that imposing liability on prosecutors will incentivize them to take proper precautions to avoid wrongful convictions. The paper creates a simple behavioral model for the prosecutor's decision to charge an individual with a crime, and explores the potential effects of three different liability schemes: none, negligence-based, and strict-liability-based.","PeriodicalId":273284,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Procedure eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prosecutorial Liability for Wrongful Convictions\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey M. Peabody\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1130250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the problem of wrongful convictions with an aim towards developing a system for reducing the rate of wrongful convictions. Because current laws only seek to compensate exonerees for wrongful convictions, it is necessary to consider strategies for reducing the rate of wrongful convictions ex ante. Because prosecutors are the principal agents capable of reducing wrongful convictions, this paper suggests that imposing liability on prosecutors will incentivize them to take proper precautions to avoid wrongful convictions. The paper creates a simple behavioral model for the prosecutor's decision to charge an individual with a crime, and explores the potential effects of three different liability schemes: none, negligence-based, and strict-liability-based.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Criminal Procedure eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Criminal Procedure eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1130250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Procedure eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1130250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨错判的问题,旨在建立一个减少错判率的制度。由于现行法律只寻求补偿冤假错判的无罪受刑人,因此有必要考虑降低事前冤假错判率的策略。由于检察官是能够减少错判的主要代理人,因此本文认为,对检察官施加责任将激励他们采取适当的预防措施以避免错判。本文创建了一个简单的行为模型来解释检察官决定起诉个人犯罪,并探讨了三种不同的责任机制的潜在影响:无责任、过失责任和严格责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prosecutorial Liability for Wrongful Convictions
This paper examines the problem of wrongful convictions with an aim towards developing a system for reducing the rate of wrongful convictions. Because current laws only seek to compensate exonerees for wrongful convictions, it is necessary to consider strategies for reducing the rate of wrongful convictions ex ante. Because prosecutors are the principal agents capable of reducing wrongful convictions, this paper suggests that imposing liability on prosecutors will incentivize them to take proper precautions to avoid wrongful convictions. The paper creates a simple behavioral model for the prosecutor's decision to charge an individual with a crime, and explores the potential effects of three different liability schemes: none, negligence-based, and strict-liability-based.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信