为什么公民社会不够好

Amitai Etzioni
{"title":"为什么公民社会不够好","authors":"Amitai Etzioni","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2948729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article distinguishes the communitarian social position from the liberal and conservative ones, and discusses its focus on the good society, which is more expansive than civil society. For communitarians, the good society fosters shared moral understanding and is hence not value-neutral. Indeed, the good society is centered on a core of substantive values. The article suggests that the concept of a good society can fill the normative void inherent in the definition of civil society. Modern societies have increasingly been faced with a moral vacuum; provided societies must uphold some values, the remaining question is — which values?","PeriodicalId":402334,"journal":{"name":"The Monochrome Society","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why the Civil Society Is Not Good Enough\",\"authors\":\"Amitai Etzioni\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2948729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article distinguishes the communitarian social position from the liberal and conservative ones, and discusses its focus on the good society, which is more expansive than civil society. For communitarians, the good society fosters shared moral understanding and is hence not value-neutral. Indeed, the good society is centered on a core of substantive values. The article suggests that the concept of a good society can fill the normative void inherent in the definition of civil society. Modern societies have increasingly been faced with a moral vacuum; provided societies must uphold some values, the remaining question is — which values?\",\"PeriodicalId\":402334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Monochrome Society\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Monochrome Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2948729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Monochrome Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2948729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文将共产主义社会立场与自由主义和保守主义社会立场进行了区分,并讨论了其对良好社会的关注,它比公民社会更具扩张性。对于社群主义者来说,良好的社会促进了共同的道德理解,因此不是价值中立的。事实上,良好的社会是以实质性价值为核心的。本文认为,良好社会概念可以填补市民社会定义固有的规范性空白。现代社会日益面临道德真空;如果社会必须坚持某些价值观,那么剩下的问题是——哪些价值观?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why the Civil Society Is Not Good Enough
This article distinguishes the communitarian social position from the liberal and conservative ones, and discusses its focus on the good society, which is more expansive than civil society. For communitarians, the good society fosters shared moral understanding and is hence not value-neutral. Indeed, the good society is centered on a core of substantive values. The article suggests that the concept of a good society can fill the normative void inherent in the definition of civil society. Modern societies have increasingly been faced with a moral vacuum; provided societies must uphold some values, the remaining question is — which values?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信