Mohamed Farag Abughalia, S. M. Tasmeeh Ahsan, Shuvra Saha
{"title":"不同模型在不同地区微电池性能的比较研究","authors":"Mohamed Farag Abughalia, S. M. Tasmeeh Ahsan, Shuvra Saha","doi":"10.1109/ICREST.2019.8644121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the performance of Microcells was analyzed using MATLAB simulation to create a real-life scenario of radio-waves signals propagating in three different environments: urban, suburban and rural area to find out the signal loss, and from that it is understood which areas are best suited for Microcells. This was achieved using several propagation models of both empirical and deterministic types for comparison purposes like Winner II model, Stanford University Interim (SUI) model, and Ericsson 9999. 1800 MHZ frequency band is considered, as Micro cell works best at this frequency range. For corresponding models, their mathematical model is used to find the Estimated maximum allowable path loss and model loss for 4G LTE process. The results are compared, and it is concluded based on simulation results that Microcells give the best result for Winner II model and poor result for Ericsson 9999 model, while real life results may differ. Mobile phone system like PHS and DECT are using Microcell which covers limited area like mall, hotel or transportation hub.","PeriodicalId":108842,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Robotics,Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Microcell’s Performance using Different Models in Different Regions\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Farag Abughalia, S. M. Tasmeeh Ahsan, Shuvra Saha\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICREST.2019.8644121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper the performance of Microcells was analyzed using MATLAB simulation to create a real-life scenario of radio-waves signals propagating in three different environments: urban, suburban and rural area to find out the signal loss, and from that it is understood which areas are best suited for Microcells. This was achieved using several propagation models of both empirical and deterministic types for comparison purposes like Winner II model, Stanford University Interim (SUI) model, and Ericsson 9999. 1800 MHZ frequency band is considered, as Micro cell works best at this frequency range. For corresponding models, their mathematical model is used to find the Estimated maximum allowable path loss and model loss for 4G LTE process. The results are compared, and it is concluded based on simulation results that Microcells give the best result for Winner II model and poor result for Ericsson 9999 model, while real life results may differ. Mobile phone system like PHS and DECT are using Microcell which covers limited area like mall, hotel or transportation hub.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Conference on Robotics,Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Conference on Robotics,Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICREST.2019.8644121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Robotics,Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICREST.2019.8644121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
本文利用MATLAB仿真对Microcells的性能进行了分析,模拟了无线电波信号在城市、郊区和农村三种不同环境下传播的真实场景,找出了信号的损耗,从而了解了哪些区域最适合Microcells。为了进行比较,我们使用了几个经验和确定性类型的传播模型,如Winner II模型、Stanford University Interim (SUI)模型和Ericsson 9999。考虑1800兆赫频带,因为Micro cell在这个频率范围内工作得最好。对于相应的模型,利用其数学模型求出4G LTE过程的估计最大允许路径损耗和模型损耗。仿真结果表明,Microcells在Winner II模型中效果最好,在Ericsson 9999模型中效果较差,但实际结果可能存在差异。移动电话系统,如小灵通和DECT使用Microcell,覆盖有限的区域,如商场,酒店或交通枢纽。
Comparative Study of Microcell’s Performance using Different Models in Different Regions
In this paper the performance of Microcells was analyzed using MATLAB simulation to create a real-life scenario of radio-waves signals propagating in three different environments: urban, suburban and rural area to find out the signal loss, and from that it is understood which areas are best suited for Microcells. This was achieved using several propagation models of both empirical and deterministic types for comparison purposes like Winner II model, Stanford University Interim (SUI) model, and Ericsson 9999. 1800 MHZ frequency band is considered, as Micro cell works best at this frequency range. For corresponding models, their mathematical model is used to find the Estimated maximum allowable path loss and model loss for 4G LTE process. The results are compared, and it is concluded based on simulation results that Microcells give the best result for Winner II model and poor result for Ericsson 9999 model, while real life results may differ. Mobile phone system like PHS and DECT are using Microcell which covers limited area like mall, hotel or transportation hub.