一种评估造林场地质量的新方法

Wei Huang, X. Zou
{"title":"一种评估造林场地质量的新方法","authors":"Wei Huang, X. Zou","doi":"10.15406/FREIJ.2018.02.00046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Matching site with trees is a key principle in reforestation programs for centuries.1,2 The conventional approach to evaluate site quality was typically achieved through correlation analyses between tree growth and environmental factors, including indices of climate, soil type, soil fertility, and topography.3,4 This empirical approach works fine, but lacks the fundamental understanding of causal relationships between tree performance and its environment, and it brings inconsistency in key factors determining site quality among tree species, between sites, and among evaluators.","PeriodicalId":176249,"journal":{"name":"Forestry Research and Engineering: International Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new approach to evaluate site quality for reforestation programs\",\"authors\":\"Wei Huang, X. Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/FREIJ.2018.02.00046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Matching site with trees is a key principle in reforestation programs for centuries.1,2 The conventional approach to evaluate site quality was typically achieved through correlation analyses between tree growth and environmental factors, including indices of climate, soil type, soil fertility, and topography.3,4 This empirical approach works fine, but lacks the fundamental understanding of causal relationships between tree performance and its environment, and it brings inconsistency in key factors determining site quality among tree species, between sites, and among evaluators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forestry Research and Engineering: International Journal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forestry Research and Engineering: International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/FREIJ.2018.02.00046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forestry Research and Engineering: International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/FREIJ.2018.02.00046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几个世纪以来,将场地与树木相匹配是重新造林计划的一个关键原则。1,2传统的立地质量评价方法通常是通过树木生长与环境因子(包括气候、土壤类型、土壤肥力和地形)之间的相关性分析来实现的。3,4这种实证方法效果良好,但缺乏对树木绩效与其环境之间因果关系的基本理解,并且导致树种之间、站点之间以及评估者之间决定立地质量的关键因素不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A new approach to evaluate site quality for reforestation programs
Matching site with trees is a key principle in reforestation programs for centuries.1,2 The conventional approach to evaluate site quality was typically achieved through correlation analyses between tree growth and environmental factors, including indices of climate, soil type, soil fertility, and topography.3,4 This empirical approach works fine, but lacks the fundamental understanding of causal relationships between tree performance and its environment, and it brings inconsistency in key factors determining site quality among tree species, between sites, and among evaluators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信