一种在组件中支持软件演进的建议

A. Rausch
{"title":"一种在组件中支持软件演进的建议","authors":"A. Rausch","doi":"10.1109/CSMR.2000.827319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In practice, a pure top down and refinement based development process is not applicable. A more iterative and incremental approach is usually applied with respect to changing requirements. We call such an approach an evolutionary approach. As existing methodologies rely on refinement concepts, they do not support an evolutionary development. We present the basic concepts of a suitable overall methodology based on componentware and software evolution. We classify the difference between refinement steps and evolution steps in a document based development methodology. We propose an evolutionary development process during system design. To support this process best, we need to be able to model and track the dependencies between the various development documents. Currently, there is no adequate modeling technique available. To close this gap, we introduce the concept of requirements/assurance contracts. These contracts can be rechecked whenever the specification of a component evolves. This allows the impacts of that evolutionary step to be determined. Developers are able to track and manage the software evolution process. A short example shows the usefulness of the presented concepts and introduces a description technique for requirements/assurance contracts in componentware.","PeriodicalId":169352,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A proposal for supporting software evolution in componentware\",\"authors\":\"A. Rausch\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSMR.2000.827319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In practice, a pure top down and refinement based development process is not applicable. A more iterative and incremental approach is usually applied with respect to changing requirements. We call such an approach an evolutionary approach. As existing methodologies rely on refinement concepts, they do not support an evolutionary development. We present the basic concepts of a suitable overall methodology based on componentware and software evolution. We classify the difference between refinement steps and evolution steps in a document based development methodology. We propose an evolutionary development process during system design. To support this process best, we need to be able to model and track the dependencies between the various development documents. Currently, there is no adequate modeling technique available. To close this gap, we introduce the concept of requirements/assurance contracts. These contracts can be rechecked whenever the specification of a component evolves. This allows the impacts of that evolutionary step to be determined. Developers are able to track and manage the software evolution process. A short example shows the usefulness of the presented concepts and introduces a description technique for requirements/assurance contracts in componentware.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2000.827319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2000.827319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在实践中,纯粹的自顶向下和基于细化的开发过程是不适用的。对于不断变化的需求,通常采用更迭代和增量的方法。我们称这种方法为进化方法。由于现有的方法依赖于细化概念,它们不支持进化开发。我们提出了基于组件和软件演化的合适的整体方法论的基本概念。我们对基于文档的开发方法中的细化步骤和演进步骤之间的区别进行了分类。在系统设计过程中,我们提出了一个渐进的开发过程。为了最好地支持这个过程,我们需要能够建模并跟踪各种开发文档之间的依赖关系。目前,还没有合适的建模技术。为了缩小这个差距,我们引入了需求/保证契约的概念。只要组件的规范发生变化,就可以重新检查这些契约。这样就可以确定进化步骤的影响。开发人员能够跟踪和管理软件演进过程。一个简短的示例展示了所提出的概念的有用性,并介绍了组件中需求/保证契约的描述技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A proposal for supporting software evolution in componentware
In practice, a pure top down and refinement based development process is not applicable. A more iterative and incremental approach is usually applied with respect to changing requirements. We call such an approach an evolutionary approach. As existing methodologies rely on refinement concepts, they do not support an evolutionary development. We present the basic concepts of a suitable overall methodology based on componentware and software evolution. We classify the difference between refinement steps and evolution steps in a document based development methodology. We propose an evolutionary development process during system design. To support this process best, we need to be able to model and track the dependencies between the various development documents. Currently, there is no adequate modeling technique available. To close this gap, we introduce the concept of requirements/assurance contracts. These contracts can be rechecked whenever the specification of a component evolves. This allows the impacts of that evolutionary step to be determined. Developers are able to track and manage the software evolution process. A short example shows the usefulness of the presented concepts and introduces a description technique for requirements/assurance contracts in componentware.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信