局部放电测量的性质

H. Kirkham, D. White
{"title":"局部放电测量的性质","authors":"H. Kirkham, D. White","doi":"10.1109/I2MTC.2019.8826841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The measurement of partial discharges in solid insulation is predictive of the long-term performance of the insulation. That makes the measurement very important in high-voltage technology. The topic has been of interest for a long time, and has been extensively studied around the world. And yet sometimes there are discussions—arguments, even—over the meaning of the results, and whether a model based on void capacitance or dipole moments is appropriate. The reason that differences of opinion can still exist in this field is grounded in the nature of the measurement itself. This paper reviews the origins of the measurement and explores its nature. The paper shows that further discussion over meaning is unwarranted because no model is appropriate. The measurement is an operationalist one.","PeriodicalId":132588,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Nature of the Measurement of Partial Discharge\",\"authors\":\"H. Kirkham, D. White\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/I2MTC.2019.8826841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The measurement of partial discharges in solid insulation is predictive of the long-term performance of the insulation. That makes the measurement very important in high-voltage technology. The topic has been of interest for a long time, and has been extensively studied around the world. And yet sometimes there are discussions—arguments, even—over the meaning of the results, and whether a model based on void capacitance or dipole moments is appropriate. The reason that differences of opinion can still exist in this field is grounded in the nature of the measurement itself. This paper reviews the origins of the measurement and explores its nature. The paper shows that further discussion over meaning is unwarranted because no model is appropriate. The measurement is an operationalist one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC.2019.8826841\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC.2019.8826841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

固体绝缘材料局部放电的测量可以预测绝缘材料的长期性能。这使得测量在高压技术中非常重要。长期以来,这个话题一直引起人们的兴趣,并在世界范围内进行了广泛的研究。然而,有时会有讨论——甚至争论——关于结果的意义,以及基于空穴电容或偶极矩的模型是否合适。在这个领域仍然存在意见分歧的原因是基于测量本身的性质。本文回顾了测量的起源,并探讨了其本质。本文表明,对意义的进一步讨论是没有必要的,因为没有合适的模型。度量是操作主义的度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Nature of the Measurement of Partial Discharge
The measurement of partial discharges in solid insulation is predictive of the long-term performance of the insulation. That makes the measurement very important in high-voltage technology. The topic has been of interest for a long time, and has been extensively studied around the world. And yet sometimes there are discussions—arguments, even—over the meaning of the results, and whether a model based on void capacitance or dipole moments is appropriate. The reason that differences of opinion can still exist in this field is grounded in the nature of the measurement itself. This paper reviews the origins of the measurement and explores its nature. The paper shows that further discussion over meaning is unwarranted because no model is appropriate. The measurement is an operationalist one.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信