{"title":"创建通用文本摘要","authors":"Yihong Gong, Xin Liu","doi":"10.1109/ICDAR.2001.953917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose two generic text summarization methods that create text summaries by ranking and extracting sentences from the original documents. The first method uses standard information retrieval methods to rank sentence relevances, while the second method uses the latent semantic analysis technique to identify semantically important sentences, for summary creations. Both methods strive to select sentences that are highly ranked and different from each other. This is an attempt to create a summary with a wider coverage of the document's main content and less redundancy. Performance evaluations on the two summarization methods are conducted by comparing their summarization outputs with the manual summaries generated by three independent human evaluators.","PeriodicalId":277816,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating generic text summaries\",\"authors\":\"Yihong Gong, Xin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDAR.2001.953917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose two generic text summarization methods that create text summaries by ranking and extracting sentences from the original documents. The first method uses standard information retrieval methods to rank sentence relevances, while the second method uses the latent semantic analysis technique to identify semantically important sentences, for summary creations. Both methods strive to select sentences that are highly ranked and different from each other. This is an attempt to create a summary with a wider coverage of the document's main content and less redundancy. Performance evaluations on the two summarization methods are conducted by comparing their summarization outputs with the manual summaries generated by three independent human evaluators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2001.953917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2001.953917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We propose two generic text summarization methods that create text summaries by ranking and extracting sentences from the original documents. The first method uses standard information retrieval methods to rank sentence relevances, while the second method uses the latent semantic analysis technique to identify semantically important sentences, for summary creations. Both methods strive to select sentences that are highly ranked and different from each other. This is an attempt to create a summary with a wider coverage of the document's main content and less redundancy. Performance evaluations on the two summarization methods are conducted by comparing their summarization outputs with the manual summaries generated by three independent human evaluators.