绘制帝国的界线:主权与塔西佗的《日耳曼icus》

R. Alston
{"title":"绘制帝国的界线:主权与塔西佗的《日耳曼icus》","authors":"R. Alston","doi":"10.30687/lexis/2724-1564/2021/02/006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay focuses on Germanicus’ performance of sovereign power in Tacitus’ Annales 1-2. That power is seen in the differentiation of citizen from non-citizen and Roman territory from non-Roman territory. Roman violence in Germany contrasts with Germanicus in the East. There he recognised a shared history and community. Sovereign power required a recognition of the sovereign by the citizen and of the citizen by the sovereign. An individual’s membership and a territory’s place within the Roman Empire depended not on innate characteristics but political negotiation. Ancient political geographies gave primacy to the political rather than the territorial in determining citizenship.","PeriodicalId":273833,"journal":{"name":"Num. 39 (n.s.) – Dicembre 2021 – Fasc. 2","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drawing Imperial Lines: Sovereignty and Tacitus’ Germanicus\",\"authors\":\"R. Alston\",\"doi\":\"10.30687/lexis/2724-1564/2021/02/006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay focuses on Germanicus’ performance of sovereign power in Tacitus’ Annales 1-2. That power is seen in the differentiation of citizen from non-citizen and Roman territory from non-Roman territory. Roman violence in Germany contrasts with Germanicus in the East. There he recognised a shared history and community. Sovereign power required a recognition of the sovereign by the citizen and of the citizen by the sovereign. An individual’s membership and a territory’s place within the Roman Empire depended not on innate characteristics but political negotiation. Ancient political geographies gave primacy to the political rather than the territorial in determining citizenship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Num. 39 (n.s.) – Dicembre 2021 – Fasc. 2\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Num. 39 (n.s.) – Dicembre 2021 – Fasc. 2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30687/lexis/2724-1564/2021/02/006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Num. 39 (n.s.) – Dicembre 2021 – Fasc. 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30687/lexis/2724-1564/2021/02/006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要关注塔西佗《年历》1-2中日耳曼库斯对主权权力的表现。这种权力体现在公民与非公民,罗马领土与非罗马领土的区别上。罗马人在日耳曼的暴力与东方的日耳曼人的暴力形成鲜明对比。在那里,他认识到了一个共同的历史和社区。主权权力要求公民承认君主,公民承认君主。一个人在罗马帝国的成员资格和领土地位不是取决于天生的特征,而是取决于政治谈判。古代政治地理学在决定公民身份时,优先考虑的是政治而不是领土。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drawing Imperial Lines: Sovereignty and Tacitus’ Germanicus
This essay focuses on Germanicus’ performance of sovereign power in Tacitus’ Annales 1-2. That power is seen in the differentiation of citizen from non-citizen and Roman territory from non-Roman territory. Roman violence in Germany contrasts with Germanicus in the East. There he recognised a shared history and community. Sovereign power required a recognition of the sovereign by the citizen and of the citizen by the sovereign. An individual’s membership and a territory’s place within the Roman Empire depended not on innate characteristics but political negotiation. Ancient political geographies gave primacy to the political rather than the territorial in determining citizenship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信