电导率作为现场残留物管理工具的使用和智能洁净室制度的定义

A. Krause, Matthew Cokely, L. Brennan, Aneta Schimanowitz
{"title":"电导率作为现场残留物管理工具的使用和智能洁净室制度的定义","authors":"A. Krause, Matthew Cokely, L. Brennan, Aneta Schimanowitz","doi":"10.37521//ejpps.27301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surface residues that result from the use of cleaning and disinfection products are becoming an increasing focus of regulators in the Cleanroom industry. Driven largely by the update to EU GMP Annex 1 [1] and best practice recommendation from the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology [2], it is now recognized that residues need to be managed to avoid any risks they could present to safety or product quality. \n\n\nResidue management can be successfully achieved by selection and use of low residue disinfectants, through the frequency and choice of rinsing agent for removal, the use of the most suitable tools for physical removal like cleanroom specific mops, or a combination of all these factors. \n\n\nUnlike product contact surfaces [3], there is no clear guidance as to what level of residue may be acceptable on small or large cleanroom surfaces, or how they can be quantified. For this reason, most people still rely on judging a surface to be ‘visibly clean’. \n\n\nTo improve detection and to quantify the level of residue on a cleanroom surface, a pragmatic method has been developed to measure residue anywhere on-site: Quantification of disinfectant residues by the use of conductivity.\n\n\nThe method of quantification of disinfectant residues using conductivity has been verified in studies by measuring the residues derived from different disinfectant types, at various scales (from bench scale upwards) and various locations, and from laboratory to representative pharmaceutical manufacturing areas. Compared to the current ‘gold standard’ that has long been used for the assessment of residues – an individual’s judgment of ‘visually clean’ - the data from conductivity measurements can eliminate this subjective human appraisal and replace it with scientific assessment.\n\n\nComparison of the visual analysis rating versus conductivity data also revealed that the human eye does indeed underestimate the actual levels of disinfectant residues remaining on surfaces in a cleanroom, resulting in potential impacts of risk to safety, contamination, time, and cost.","PeriodicalId":300408,"journal":{"name":"EJPPS EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Conductivity as a Tool for On-site Residue Management and Definition of Smart Cleanroom Regimes\",\"authors\":\"A. Krause, Matthew Cokely, L. Brennan, Aneta Schimanowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.37521//ejpps.27301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Surface residues that result from the use of cleaning and disinfection products are becoming an increasing focus of regulators in the Cleanroom industry. Driven largely by the update to EU GMP Annex 1 [1] and best practice recommendation from the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology [2], it is now recognized that residues need to be managed to avoid any risks they could present to safety or product quality. \\n\\n\\nResidue management can be successfully achieved by selection and use of low residue disinfectants, through the frequency and choice of rinsing agent for removal, the use of the most suitable tools for physical removal like cleanroom specific mops, or a combination of all these factors. \\n\\n\\nUnlike product contact surfaces [3], there is no clear guidance as to what level of residue may be acceptable on small or large cleanroom surfaces, or how they can be quantified. For this reason, most people still rely on judging a surface to be ‘visibly clean’. \\n\\n\\nTo improve detection and to quantify the level of residue on a cleanroom surface, a pragmatic method has been developed to measure residue anywhere on-site: Quantification of disinfectant residues by the use of conductivity.\\n\\n\\nThe method of quantification of disinfectant residues using conductivity has been verified in studies by measuring the residues derived from different disinfectant types, at various scales (from bench scale upwards) and various locations, and from laboratory to representative pharmaceutical manufacturing areas. Compared to the current ‘gold standard’ that has long been used for the assessment of residues – an individual’s judgment of ‘visually clean’ - the data from conductivity measurements can eliminate this subjective human appraisal and replace it with scientific assessment.\\n\\n\\nComparison of the visual analysis rating versus conductivity data also revealed that the human eye does indeed underestimate the actual levels of disinfectant residues remaining on surfaces in a cleanroom, resulting in potential impacts of risk to safety, contamination, time, and cost.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJPPS EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJPPS EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37521//ejpps.27301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJPPS EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37521//ejpps.27301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用清洁和消毒产品产生的表面残留物正成为洁净室行业监管机构日益关注的焦点。主要受EU GMP附录1[1]的更新和PDA制药科学与技术杂志[1]的最佳实践推荐的推动,现在人们认识到需要对残留物进行管理,以避免它们可能对安全或产品质量造成的任何风险。残留物管理可以通过选择和使用低残留消毒剂,通过去除漂洗剂的频率和选择,使用最合适的工具进行物理去除,如洁净室专用拖把,或所有这些因素的组合来成功实现。与产品接触面[3]不同,对于小型或大型洁净室表面可接受的残留水平,或如何量化,没有明确的指导。出于这个原因,大多数人仍然依赖于判断一个表面是否“明显干净”。为了改进检测和量化洁净室表面的残留水平,开发了一种实用的方法来测量现场任何地方的残留:通过使用电导率来量化消毒剂残留。利用电导率定量消毒剂残留的方法已经在研究中得到验证,通过测量来自不同类型消毒剂的残留物,在不同的规模(从实验规模向上)和不同的地点,从实验室到代表性的制药生产区域。与目前长期用于残留物评估的“黄金标准”(个人对“视觉清洁”的判断)相比,电导率测量的数据可以消除这种主观的人类评估,取而代之的是科学评估。视觉分析等级与电导率数据的比较还显示,人眼确实低估了洁净室表面上残留的消毒剂的实际水平,从而对安全、污染、时间和成本造成潜在的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of Conductivity as a Tool for On-site Residue Management and Definition of Smart Cleanroom Regimes
Surface residues that result from the use of cleaning and disinfection products are becoming an increasing focus of regulators in the Cleanroom industry. Driven largely by the update to EU GMP Annex 1 [1] and best practice recommendation from the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology [2], it is now recognized that residues need to be managed to avoid any risks they could present to safety or product quality. Residue management can be successfully achieved by selection and use of low residue disinfectants, through the frequency and choice of rinsing agent for removal, the use of the most suitable tools for physical removal like cleanroom specific mops, or a combination of all these factors. Unlike product contact surfaces [3], there is no clear guidance as to what level of residue may be acceptable on small or large cleanroom surfaces, or how they can be quantified. For this reason, most people still rely on judging a surface to be ‘visibly clean’. To improve detection and to quantify the level of residue on a cleanroom surface, a pragmatic method has been developed to measure residue anywhere on-site: Quantification of disinfectant residues by the use of conductivity. The method of quantification of disinfectant residues using conductivity has been verified in studies by measuring the residues derived from different disinfectant types, at various scales (from bench scale upwards) and various locations, and from laboratory to representative pharmaceutical manufacturing areas. Compared to the current ‘gold standard’ that has long been used for the assessment of residues – an individual’s judgment of ‘visually clean’ - the data from conductivity measurements can eliminate this subjective human appraisal and replace it with scientific assessment. Comparison of the visual analysis rating versus conductivity data also revealed that the human eye does indeed underestimate the actual levels of disinfectant residues remaining on surfaces in a cleanroom, resulting in potential impacts of risk to safety, contamination, time, and cost.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信