在紧急和基于位置的服务中发现全球导航卫星系统

Ali Sarwar, Binghao Li
{"title":"在紧急和基于位置的服务中发现全球导航卫星系统","authors":"Ali Sarwar, Binghao Li","doi":"10.5081/JGPS.11.2.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Location Based Systems (LBS) market has emerged exponentially since early 2000 in the wake of growing need for Emergency Relief Applications. The argument of course outstanding is which device outperforms all other in diverse scenarios without failure. While many purpose built LBS are in use, SPOT satellite messenger gained attention for its reliability. This paper summates the system architecture and experimental tests results with those of competing Assisted and Global Navigation Satellite Systems (A/GNSS). Our test bed comprised of 26 test points with pre-established database of GNSS difficulty levels in diverse environments in UNSW. Parameters of interest are availability, accuracy and Time to First Fix (TTFF). Relative benchmarking proves SPOT’s higher TTFF and higher failure rate in general. While High Sensitivity GNSS and Assisted GNSS (MSBased and MS-Assisted) had higher availability, higher accuracy and lower TTFF. Altogether fewer failure scenarios, trustworthy coverage with cost effectiveness were observed for MS-Based AGNSS which is vital for LBS applications. However reliance on wired or wireless IP network potentially limits the performance in nonexistent underlying infrastructure in remote applications. SPOT demonstrated higher TTFF and failure rates in test scenario. On the contrary Assisted GNSS (MS-Based or MS-Assisted) can provide a reliable, cost effective and open source alternative to SPOT satellite messenger with better TTFF, availability and accuracy for consumer and research applications.","PeriodicalId":237555,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Positioning Systems","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SPOT GNSS in Emergency and Location Based Services\",\"authors\":\"Ali Sarwar, Binghao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.5081/JGPS.11.2.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Location Based Systems (LBS) market has emerged exponentially since early 2000 in the wake of growing need for Emergency Relief Applications. The argument of course outstanding is which device outperforms all other in diverse scenarios without failure. While many purpose built LBS are in use, SPOT satellite messenger gained attention for its reliability. This paper summates the system architecture and experimental tests results with those of competing Assisted and Global Navigation Satellite Systems (A/GNSS). Our test bed comprised of 26 test points with pre-established database of GNSS difficulty levels in diverse environments in UNSW. Parameters of interest are availability, accuracy and Time to First Fix (TTFF). Relative benchmarking proves SPOT’s higher TTFF and higher failure rate in general. While High Sensitivity GNSS and Assisted GNSS (MSBased and MS-Assisted) had higher availability, higher accuracy and lower TTFF. Altogether fewer failure scenarios, trustworthy coverage with cost effectiveness were observed for MS-Based AGNSS which is vital for LBS applications. However reliance on wired or wireless IP network potentially limits the performance in nonexistent underlying infrastructure in remote applications. SPOT demonstrated higher TTFF and failure rates in test scenario. On the contrary Assisted GNSS (MS-Based or MS-Assisted) can provide a reliable, cost effective and open source alternative to SPOT satellite messenger with better TTFF, availability and accuracy for consumer and research applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Positioning Systems\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Positioning Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5081/JGPS.11.2.100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Positioning Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5081/JGPS.11.2.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

自2000年初以来,随着紧急救援应用需求的增长,基于位置的系统(LBS)市场呈指数级增长。当然,争论的焦点在于,哪种设备在不同的场景下表现得比其他所有设备都好。虽然许多专用的LBS正在使用中,但SPOT卫星信使因其可靠性而受到关注。本文总结了该系统的体系结构和实验测试结果,并与竞争的辅助导航卫星系统和全球导航卫星系统(A/GNSS)进行了比较。我们的测试平台由26个测试点组成,并预先建立了UNSW不同环境下GNSS难度级别的数据库。感兴趣的参数是可用性、准确性和首次修复时间(TTFF)。相对基准测试证明SPOT总体上具有较高的TTFF和较高的故障率。而高灵敏度GNSS和辅助GNSS (ms - based和MS-Assisted)具有更高的可用性、更高的精度和更低的TTFF。总的来说,基于ms的AGNSS观察到更少的故障场景,可靠的覆盖范围和成本效益,这对LBS应用至关重要。然而,对有线或无线IP网络的依赖可能会限制远程应用程序中不存在的底层基础设施的性能。SPOT在测试场景中显示出更高的TTFF和故障率。相反,辅助GNSS (MS-Based或MS-Assisted)可以为消费者和研究应用提供可靠、经济、开源的SPOT卫星信使替代方案,具有更好的TTFF、可用性和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SPOT GNSS in Emergency and Location Based Services
Location Based Systems (LBS) market has emerged exponentially since early 2000 in the wake of growing need for Emergency Relief Applications. The argument of course outstanding is which device outperforms all other in diverse scenarios without failure. While many purpose built LBS are in use, SPOT satellite messenger gained attention for its reliability. This paper summates the system architecture and experimental tests results with those of competing Assisted and Global Navigation Satellite Systems (A/GNSS). Our test bed comprised of 26 test points with pre-established database of GNSS difficulty levels in diverse environments in UNSW. Parameters of interest are availability, accuracy and Time to First Fix (TTFF). Relative benchmarking proves SPOT’s higher TTFF and higher failure rate in general. While High Sensitivity GNSS and Assisted GNSS (MSBased and MS-Assisted) had higher availability, higher accuracy and lower TTFF. Altogether fewer failure scenarios, trustworthy coverage with cost effectiveness were observed for MS-Based AGNSS which is vital for LBS applications. However reliance on wired or wireless IP network potentially limits the performance in nonexistent underlying infrastructure in remote applications. SPOT demonstrated higher TTFF and failure rates in test scenario. On the contrary Assisted GNSS (MS-Based or MS-Assisted) can provide a reliable, cost effective and open source alternative to SPOT satellite messenger with better TTFF, availability and accuracy for consumer and research applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信