专业记者和免费记者:介于法律和社会现实之间

Fadia Anggraini Prayudistian, Sofia Nur Isma, M. Syahri, Moh. Fikri Zulfikar
{"title":"专业记者和免费记者:介于法律和社会现实之间","authors":"Fadia Anggraini Prayudistian, Sofia Nur Isma, M. Syahri, Moh. Fikri Zulfikar","doi":"10.15408/jsj.v5i1.31477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to (1) provide detention and explanation related to Article 6 of the Indonesian journalism code of ethics that  it is not allowed for Indonesian journalists both to abuse their professions and to accept bribes; (2) to provide explanations thatit is not permitted for professional journalists to receive gratuity, (3) to describe examples of violation cases of the Article 6 that the Indonesian journalists should not abuse their professionsas well as accept any bribes in the form of the online news writing discourses portal Kupastuntas.co. and Liputan6.com; and (4) to describe examples of cases related to the extra payment to journalists in the form of written discourses on the online news portal AyoBandung.com. This article uses a qualitative research method, in which data on cases of violations of the Article 6 on the online news portal Kupastuntas.co., Liputan6.com. and AyoBandung.com written descriptively.The data collected were secondary which were obtained by using observation techniques in the form of notes. Based on the presentation in this article, there are shown: (1) both the interpretation and the explanation of the Article 6; (2) the explanation of gratification; (3) examples of cases regarding Article 6; and (4) examples of cases of gratification. From the discussion and case examples presented, it was found that there was compatibility between the theory used and the case examples used.","PeriodicalId":338967,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Studi Jurnalistik","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wartawan Profesional dan Gratifikasi: Antara Hukum dan Realitas Sosial\",\"authors\":\"Fadia Anggraini Prayudistian, Sofia Nur Isma, M. Syahri, Moh. Fikri Zulfikar\",\"doi\":\"10.15408/jsj.v5i1.31477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to (1) provide detention and explanation related to Article 6 of the Indonesian journalism code of ethics that  it is not allowed for Indonesian journalists both to abuse their professions and to accept bribes; (2) to provide explanations thatit is not permitted for professional journalists to receive gratuity, (3) to describe examples of violation cases of the Article 6 that the Indonesian journalists should not abuse their professionsas well as accept any bribes in the form of the online news writing discourses portal Kupastuntas.co. and Liputan6.com; and (4) to describe examples of cases related to the extra payment to journalists in the form of written discourses on the online news portal AyoBandung.com. This article uses a qualitative research method, in which data on cases of violations of the Article 6 on the online news portal Kupastuntas.co., Liputan6.com. and AyoBandung.com written descriptively.The data collected were secondary which were obtained by using observation techniques in the form of notes. Based on the presentation in this article, there are shown: (1) both the interpretation and the explanation of the Article 6; (2) the explanation of gratification; (3) examples of cases regarding Article 6; and (4) examples of cases of gratification. From the discussion and case examples presented, it was found that there was compatibility between the theory used and the case examples used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Studi Jurnalistik\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Studi Jurnalistik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15408/jsj.v5i1.31477\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Studi Jurnalistik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jsj.v5i1.31477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的目的是(1)提供拘留和解释与印度尼西亚新闻道德守则第6条有关的问题,即印度尼西亚记者不得滥用其职业和接受贿赂;(2)解释专业记者不得收取酬金;(3)举例说明违反第6条的案例,即印尼记者不得滥用其专业,也不得以线上新闻写作话语门户网站Kupastuntas.co收受贿赂。和Liputan6.com;(4)举例说明新闻门户网站AyoBandung.com以书面话语的形式向记者支付额外报酬的案例。本文采用定性研究方法,对在线新闻门户网站Kupastuntas.co.上违反第6条的案例进行数据分析。, Liputan6.com。AyoBandung.com的描述。收集的数据为二次数据,采用观察技术以笔记的形式获得。根据本文的介绍,可以看出:(1)对第6条的解释和解释;(2)满足感的解释;(三)有关第六条的例子;(4)满足的例子。从讨论和提供的案例中可以发现,所使用的理论与所使用的案例之间存在兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wartawan Profesional dan Gratifikasi: Antara Hukum dan Realitas Sosial
This article aims to (1) provide detention and explanation related to Article 6 of the Indonesian journalism code of ethics that  it is not allowed for Indonesian journalists both to abuse their professions and to accept bribes; (2) to provide explanations thatit is not permitted for professional journalists to receive gratuity, (3) to describe examples of violation cases of the Article 6 that the Indonesian journalists should not abuse their professionsas well as accept any bribes in the form of the online news writing discourses portal Kupastuntas.co. and Liputan6.com; and (4) to describe examples of cases related to the extra payment to journalists in the form of written discourses on the online news portal AyoBandung.com. This article uses a qualitative research method, in which data on cases of violations of the Article 6 on the online news portal Kupastuntas.co., Liputan6.com. and AyoBandung.com written descriptively.The data collected were secondary which were obtained by using observation techniques in the form of notes. Based on the presentation in this article, there are shown: (1) both the interpretation and the explanation of the Article 6; (2) the explanation of gratification; (3) examples of cases regarding Article 6; and (4) examples of cases of gratification. From the discussion and case examples presented, it was found that there was compatibility between the theory used and the case examples used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信