{"title":"非法提供国家和市政优惠的法律Сonsequences","authors":"I. P. Bochinin","doi":"10.47361/2542-0259-2022-3-31-22-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the legal consequences of the unlawful provision of state and municipal preferences in violation of Chapter 5 of Federal Law No. 135–FZ of 26.07.2006 “On Protection of Competition”. According to the results of the research, it is concluded that the unlawful provision of preferences may entail various, including civil law, consequences for both public authority (an organization or body performing the functions of a public authority) and an economic entity — the recipient of the preference.","PeriodicalId":250547,"journal":{"name":"Russian competition law and economy","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Сonsequences of the Unlawful Provision of State and Municipal Preferences\",\"authors\":\"I. P. Bochinin\",\"doi\":\"10.47361/2542-0259-2022-3-31-22-27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article considers the legal consequences of the unlawful provision of state and municipal preferences in violation of Chapter 5 of Federal Law No. 135–FZ of 26.07.2006 “On Protection of Competition”. According to the results of the research, it is concluded that the unlawful provision of preferences may entail various, including civil law, consequences for both public authority (an organization or body performing the functions of a public authority) and an economic entity — the recipient of the preference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian competition law and economy\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian competition law and economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2022-3-31-22-27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian competition law and economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2022-3-31-22-27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Legal Сonsequences of the Unlawful Provision of State and Municipal Preferences
The article considers the legal consequences of the unlawful provision of state and municipal preferences in violation of Chapter 5 of Federal Law No. 135–FZ of 26.07.2006 “On Protection of Competition”. According to the results of the research, it is concluded that the unlawful provision of preferences may entail various, including civil law, consequences for both public authority (an organization or body performing the functions of a public authority) and an economic entity — the recipient of the preference.