{"title":"我们能在DBMS中分析大数据吗?","authors":"C. Ordonez","doi":"10.1145/2513190.2513198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relational DBMSs remain the main data management technology, despite the big data analytics and no-SQL waves. On the other hand, for data analytics in a broad sense, there are plenty of non-DBMS tools including statistical languages, matrix packages, generic data mining programs and large-scale parallel systems, being the main technology for big data analytics. Such large-scale systems are mostly based on the Hadoop distributed file system and MapReduce. Thus it would seem a DBMS is not a good technology to analyze big data, going beyond SQL queries, acting just as a reliable and fast data repository. In this survey, we argue that is not the case, explaining important research that has enabled analytics on large databases inside a DBMS. However, we also argue DBMSs cannot compete with parallel systems like MapReduce to analyze web-scale text data. Therefore, each technology will keep influencing each other. We conclude with a proposal of long-term research issues, considering the \"big data analytics\" trend.","PeriodicalId":335396,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can we analyze big data inside a DBMS?\",\"authors\":\"C. Ordonez\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2513190.2513198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relational DBMSs remain the main data management technology, despite the big data analytics and no-SQL waves. On the other hand, for data analytics in a broad sense, there are plenty of non-DBMS tools including statistical languages, matrix packages, generic data mining programs and large-scale parallel systems, being the main technology for big data analytics. Such large-scale systems are mostly based on the Hadoop distributed file system and MapReduce. Thus it would seem a DBMS is not a good technology to analyze big data, going beyond SQL queries, acting just as a reliable and fast data repository. In this survey, we argue that is not the case, explaining important research that has enabled analytics on large databases inside a DBMS. However, we also argue DBMSs cannot compete with parallel systems like MapReduce to analyze web-scale text data. Therefore, each technology will keep influencing each other. We conclude with a proposal of long-term research issues, considering the \\\"big data analytics\\\" trend.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2513190.2513198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2513190.2513198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Relational DBMSs remain the main data management technology, despite the big data analytics and no-SQL waves. On the other hand, for data analytics in a broad sense, there are plenty of non-DBMS tools including statistical languages, matrix packages, generic data mining programs and large-scale parallel systems, being the main technology for big data analytics. Such large-scale systems are mostly based on the Hadoop distributed file system and MapReduce. Thus it would seem a DBMS is not a good technology to analyze big data, going beyond SQL queries, acting just as a reliable and fast data repository. In this survey, we argue that is not the case, explaining important research that has enabled analytics on large databases inside a DBMS. However, we also argue DBMSs cannot compete with parallel systems like MapReduce to analyze web-scale text data. Therefore, each technology will keep influencing each other. We conclude with a proposal of long-term research issues, considering the "big data analytics" trend.