科斯塔·p·马诺伊洛维奇和礼仪歌唱的教学

New Sound Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.5937/newso1901019p
I. Perković, Biljana Mandić
{"title":"科斯塔·p·马诺伊洛维奇和礼仪歌唱的教学","authors":"I. Perković, Biljana Mandić","doi":"10.5937/newso1901019p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we deal with Kosta Manojlović's engagement in the field of church music education, especially within curricula of the Pravoslavno-bogoslovski fakultet [Faculty of Orthodox Theology] in Belgrade, aiming to answer two research question: one, regarding different aspects of Manojlović's work at the between 1923 and 1937, and the other, dealing with ways in which his writings on the Serbian Orthodox church music were affected by the historical, social, and cultural milieu of the interwar period. An analysis of Manojlović's teaching catalogues for the Faculty of Orthodox Theology between 1923/24 and 1936/37, showed three basic models in syllabus organisation: in his early teaching career, he was teaching two subjects \"Octoechos\" and \"History of Serbian Orthodox Church Singing Church Choral Music\" (in 1923/24); as mid-career teacher (between 1924/25 and 1934/35) he was teaching \"Octoechos\" and \"Strano pjenije\", while in the last years spent at the school Manojlović's teaching subjects were \"History of Church Music\" and \"Octoechos and General Chant\". However, the most important aspects of Manojlović's teaching philosophy are not available in syllabus of his courses. For that reasons, we turned to his published writings, having in mind his plans for introducing more research tools into curricula of the Faculty of Orthodox Theology. He advocated the introduction of scientific methods: in his opinion, this was the only acceptable and credible method for an academic approach to Serbian sacred music. Among many subjects in the field of Serbian Orthodox music, Kosta P. Manojlović wrote about the relevance of Serbian medieval literature, and he was one of the first authors who recognized the importance of this subject for expanding the horizon of otherwise modest knowledge of medieval music. We explain the ways in which some of his readings of the genre of žitije (vita), the life of a saint, were influenced by the discourse of svetosavlje and the idea of emphasizing the ethnic as part of the Christian, without taking into account the process of idealization, which is a canonical element of the genre of žitije. The picture of Kosta Manojlović's teaching practice presented in this article is generally more detailed and enriched with new data and analysis of certain aspects of his work. Unfortunately, it was not possible to follow the long-term effects of his interventions and actions at the Univerzitet u Beogradu [University of Belgrade] as the Faculty of Orthodox Theology was split from the University in 1952. Manojlović had the difficult task of building his career as a university teacher in an environment that was not always supportive of his efforts, especially when it came to his integration of research into teaching, but he did accomplish his task by integrating his knowledge, acting and being. His integration of research and practical work in the field of Serbian chant, even if we may not agree with all his conclusions, was visionary and is still a valid, and the most preferred, approach to the subject.","PeriodicalId":315139,"journal":{"name":"New Sound","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kosta P. Manojlović and the teaching of liturgical singing\",\"authors\":\"I. Perković, Biljana Mandić\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/newso1901019p\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we deal with Kosta Manojlović's engagement in the field of church music education, especially within curricula of the Pravoslavno-bogoslovski fakultet [Faculty of Orthodox Theology] in Belgrade, aiming to answer two research question: one, regarding different aspects of Manojlović's work at the between 1923 and 1937, and the other, dealing with ways in which his writings on the Serbian Orthodox church music were affected by the historical, social, and cultural milieu of the interwar period. An analysis of Manojlović's teaching catalogues for the Faculty of Orthodox Theology between 1923/24 and 1936/37, showed three basic models in syllabus organisation: in his early teaching career, he was teaching two subjects \\\"Octoechos\\\" and \\\"History of Serbian Orthodox Church Singing Church Choral Music\\\" (in 1923/24); as mid-career teacher (between 1924/25 and 1934/35) he was teaching \\\"Octoechos\\\" and \\\"Strano pjenije\\\", while in the last years spent at the school Manojlović's teaching subjects were \\\"History of Church Music\\\" and \\\"Octoechos and General Chant\\\". However, the most important aspects of Manojlović's teaching philosophy are not available in syllabus of his courses. For that reasons, we turned to his published writings, having in mind his plans for introducing more research tools into curricula of the Faculty of Orthodox Theology. He advocated the introduction of scientific methods: in his opinion, this was the only acceptable and credible method for an academic approach to Serbian sacred music. Among many subjects in the field of Serbian Orthodox music, Kosta P. Manojlović wrote about the relevance of Serbian medieval literature, and he was one of the first authors who recognized the importance of this subject for expanding the horizon of otherwise modest knowledge of medieval music. We explain the ways in which some of his readings of the genre of žitije (vita), the life of a saint, were influenced by the discourse of svetosavlje and the idea of emphasizing the ethnic as part of the Christian, without taking into account the process of idealization, which is a canonical element of the genre of žitije. The picture of Kosta Manojlović's teaching practice presented in this article is generally more detailed and enriched with new data and analysis of certain aspects of his work. Unfortunately, it was not possible to follow the long-term effects of his interventions and actions at the Univerzitet u Beogradu [University of Belgrade] as the Faculty of Orthodox Theology was split from the University in 1952. Manojlović had the difficult task of building his career as a university teacher in an environment that was not always supportive of his efforts, especially when it came to his integration of research into teaching, but he did accomplish his task by integrating his knowledge, acting and being. His integration of research and practical work in the field of Serbian chant, even if we may not agree with all his conclusions, was visionary and is still a valid, and the most preferred, approach to the subject.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Sound\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Sound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/newso1901019p\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Sound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/newso1901019p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们处理科斯塔·马诺伊洛维奇在教堂音乐教育领域的参与,特别是在贝尔格莱德的Pravoslavno-bogoslovski fakultet[东正教神学院]的课程中,旨在回答两个研究问题:一篇是关于马诺伊洛维奇在1923年至1937年间作品的不同方面,另一篇是关于他关于塞尔维亚东正教教堂音乐的作品是如何受到两次世界大战期间历史、社会和文化环境的影响的。对马诺伊洛维奇1923/24至1936/37年间正教神学院教学目录的分析显示了教学大纲组织的三种基本模式:在他早期的教学生涯中,他教授两门科目“八世纪”和“塞尔维亚东正教教堂歌唱教堂合唱音乐的历史”(1923/24);作为职业生涯中期的教师(1924/25年至1934/35年),他教授“八世纪曲”和“斯特拉诺pjenije”,而在学校的最后几年,马诺伊洛维奇的教学科目是“教会音乐史”和“八世纪曲和一般圣歌”。然而,马诺伊洛维奇教学哲学中最重要的方面并没有体现在他的课程大纲中。出于这个原因,我们转向了他发表的著作,并考虑到他计划在东正教神学院的课程中引入更多的研究工具。他主张采用科学方法:在他看来,这是对塞尔维亚神圣音乐进行学术研究的唯一可接受和可信的方法。在塞尔维亚东正教音乐领域的许多主题中,Kosta P. manojloviki写了关于塞尔维亚中世纪文学的相关性,他是第一批认识到这一主题对扩大中世纪音乐知识范围的重要性的作者之一。我们解释了他对žitije (vita)类型的一些解读方式,圣人的生活,受到svetosavlje的话语和强调民族作为基督教一部分的想法的影响,而没有考虑到理想化的过程,这是žitije类型的典型元素。本文介绍的科斯塔·马诺伊洛维奇的教学实践总体上更加详细,并通过对其工作某些方面的新数据和分析进行了丰富。不幸的是,由于东正教神学院于1952年从贝尔格莱德大学分离,他的干预和行动的长期影响无法追踪。作为一名大学教师,马诺伊洛维奇在一个并不总是支持他努力的环境中建立自己的职业生涯是一项艰巨的任务,特别是当他将研究融入教学时,但他确实通过整合他的知识,行动和存在来完成他的任务。他在塞尔维亚圣歌领域的研究和实际工作的结合,即使我们可能不同意他的所有结论,是有远见的,仍然是一个有效的和最受欢迎的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kosta P. Manojlović and the teaching of liturgical singing
In this paper we deal with Kosta Manojlović's engagement in the field of church music education, especially within curricula of the Pravoslavno-bogoslovski fakultet [Faculty of Orthodox Theology] in Belgrade, aiming to answer two research question: one, regarding different aspects of Manojlović's work at the between 1923 and 1937, and the other, dealing with ways in which his writings on the Serbian Orthodox church music were affected by the historical, social, and cultural milieu of the interwar period. An analysis of Manojlović's teaching catalogues for the Faculty of Orthodox Theology between 1923/24 and 1936/37, showed three basic models in syllabus organisation: in his early teaching career, he was teaching two subjects "Octoechos" and "History of Serbian Orthodox Church Singing Church Choral Music" (in 1923/24); as mid-career teacher (between 1924/25 and 1934/35) he was teaching "Octoechos" and "Strano pjenije", while in the last years spent at the school Manojlović's teaching subjects were "History of Church Music" and "Octoechos and General Chant". However, the most important aspects of Manojlović's teaching philosophy are not available in syllabus of his courses. For that reasons, we turned to his published writings, having in mind his plans for introducing more research tools into curricula of the Faculty of Orthodox Theology. He advocated the introduction of scientific methods: in his opinion, this was the only acceptable and credible method for an academic approach to Serbian sacred music. Among many subjects in the field of Serbian Orthodox music, Kosta P. Manojlović wrote about the relevance of Serbian medieval literature, and he was one of the first authors who recognized the importance of this subject for expanding the horizon of otherwise modest knowledge of medieval music. We explain the ways in which some of his readings of the genre of žitije (vita), the life of a saint, were influenced by the discourse of svetosavlje and the idea of emphasizing the ethnic as part of the Christian, without taking into account the process of idealization, which is a canonical element of the genre of žitije. The picture of Kosta Manojlović's teaching practice presented in this article is generally more detailed and enriched with new data and analysis of certain aspects of his work. Unfortunately, it was not possible to follow the long-term effects of his interventions and actions at the Univerzitet u Beogradu [University of Belgrade] as the Faculty of Orthodox Theology was split from the University in 1952. Manojlović had the difficult task of building his career as a university teacher in an environment that was not always supportive of his efforts, especially when it came to his integration of research into teaching, but he did accomplish his task by integrating his knowledge, acting and being. His integration of research and practical work in the field of Serbian chant, even if we may not agree with all his conclusions, was visionary and is still a valid, and the most preferred, approach to the subject.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信