关于人身保护制度趋同的人道主义基本考虑

A. Augusto, Cançado Trindade
{"title":"关于人身保护制度趋同的人道主义基本考虑","authors":"A. Augusto, Cançado Trindade","doi":"10.1163/9789004255074_025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A critical review of classic doctrine concerning the regimes of protection of the human person reveals that it used to endorse a rather compartmentalized outlook, - distinguishing the International Law of Human Rights, International Refugee Law and International Humanitarian Law, - due in great part to an exagerated emphasis in the distinct historical origins of the three regimes of protection. The character of jus cogens of non-refoulement places this latter above political considerations both of States and of political organs of international organizations; in this way, it also calls the attention to the importance of the access of the individuals to justice at international level. Despite the incongruities of the practice of States in our times, the opinio juris communis enlightens the path to follow, which is prevalence of the fundamental rights of the human person in all and any circumstances. Keywords:International Human Rights Law; International Humanitarian Law; International Refugee Law; jus cogens; non-refoulement","PeriodicalId":347946,"journal":{"name":"International Law for Humankind","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basic Considerations of Humanity in Relation to the Convergences of Regimes of Protection of the Human Person\",\"authors\":\"A. Augusto, Cançado Trindade\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004255074_025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A critical review of classic doctrine concerning the regimes of protection of the human person reveals that it used to endorse a rather compartmentalized outlook, - distinguishing the International Law of Human Rights, International Refugee Law and International Humanitarian Law, - due in great part to an exagerated emphasis in the distinct historical origins of the three regimes of protection. The character of jus cogens of non-refoulement places this latter above political considerations both of States and of political organs of international organizations; in this way, it also calls the attention to the importance of the access of the individuals to justice at international level. Despite the incongruities of the practice of States in our times, the opinio juris communis enlightens the path to follow, which is prevalence of the fundamental rights of the human person in all and any circumstances. Keywords:International Human Rights Law; International Humanitarian Law; International Refugee Law; jus cogens; non-refoulement\",\"PeriodicalId\":347946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Law for Humankind\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Law for Humankind\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004255074_025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Law for Humankind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004255074_025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对关于人身保护制度的经典学说的批判性审查表明,它过去赞成一种相当划分的观点,即区分国际人权法、国际难民法和国际人道主义法,这在很大程度上是由于过分强调三种保护制度的不同历史渊源。不驱回强制法的性质使后者凌驾于国家和国际组织政治机构的政治考虑之上;这样,它还提请注意个人在国际一级诉诸司法的重要性。尽管各国在我们这个时代的做法不协调,但社会法律意见为今后的道路指明了方向,即在所有和任何情况下普遍享有人的基本权利。关键词:国际人权法;国际人道主义法;国际难民法;强制法;non-refoulement
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Basic Considerations of Humanity in Relation to the Convergences of Regimes of Protection of the Human Person
A critical review of classic doctrine concerning the regimes of protection of the human person reveals that it used to endorse a rather compartmentalized outlook, - distinguishing the International Law of Human Rights, International Refugee Law and International Humanitarian Law, - due in great part to an exagerated emphasis in the distinct historical origins of the three regimes of protection. The character of jus cogens of non-refoulement places this latter above political considerations both of States and of political organs of international organizations; in this way, it also calls the attention to the importance of the access of the individuals to justice at international level. Despite the incongruities of the practice of States in our times, the opinio juris communis enlightens the path to follow, which is prevalence of the fundamental rights of the human person in all and any circumstances. Keywords:International Human Rights Law; International Humanitarian Law; International Refugee Law; jus cogens; non-refoulement
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信