评价学习对象在CS1中的使用

L. D. Miller, Leen-Kiat Soh, Gwen Nugent, K. Kupzyk, Leyla Masmaliyeva, A. Samal
{"title":"评价学习对象在CS1中的使用","authors":"L. D. Miller, Leen-Kiat Soh, Gwen Nugent, K. Kupzyk, Leyla Masmaliyeva, A. Samal","doi":"10.1145/1953163.1953183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning objects (LOs) have been previously used in computer science education. However, analyses in previous studies have been limited to surveys with limited numbers of LOs and students. The lack of copious quantitative data on how LOs impact student learning makes detailed analysis of LO usefulness problematic. Using an empirical approach, we have studied a suite of LOs, comprehensive in both the content covered and the range of difficulty, deployed to CS1 courses from 2007-2010. We review previous work on predictors of achievement and impact of active learning and feedback. We also provide a high-level overview of our LO deployment. Finally, based on our analysis of student interaction data, we found that (1) students using LOs have significantly higher assessment scores than the control group, (2) several student attributes are significant predictors of learning, (3) active learning has a significant effect on student assessment scores, and (4) feedback does not have a significant effect, but there are variables with significant moderating effects.","PeriodicalId":137934,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the use of learning objects in CS1\",\"authors\":\"L. D. Miller, Leen-Kiat Soh, Gwen Nugent, K. Kupzyk, Leyla Masmaliyeva, A. Samal\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1953163.1953183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learning objects (LOs) have been previously used in computer science education. However, analyses in previous studies have been limited to surveys with limited numbers of LOs and students. The lack of copious quantitative data on how LOs impact student learning makes detailed analysis of LO usefulness problematic. Using an empirical approach, we have studied a suite of LOs, comprehensive in both the content covered and the range of difficulty, deployed to CS1 courses from 2007-2010. We review previous work on predictors of achievement and impact of active learning and feedback. We also provide a high-level overview of our LO deployment. Finally, based on our analysis of student interaction data, we found that (1) students using LOs have significantly higher assessment scores than the control group, (2) several student attributes are significant predictors of learning, (3) active learning has a significant effect on student assessment scores, and (4) feedback does not have a significant effect, but there are variables with significant moderating effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

学习对象(LOs)以前在计算机科学教育中使用过。然而,以前的研究分析仅限于有限数量的LOs和学生的调查。由于缺乏丰富的定量数据来说明语言学习对学生学习的影响,因此对语言学习有用性的详细分析存在问题。采用实证方法,我们研究了一套教材,涵盖的内容和难度范围都很全面,从2007年到2010年部署在CS1课程中。我们回顾了以往的研究成果的预测因素和积极学习和反馈的影响。我们还提供了LO部署的高级概述。最后,基于我们对学生互动数据的分析,我们发现:(1)使用LOs的学生的评估分数显著高于对照组,(2)学生的几个属性是学习的显著预测因子,(3)主动学习对学生的评估分数有显著影响,(4)反馈没有显著影响,但有显著调节作用的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the use of learning objects in CS1
Learning objects (LOs) have been previously used in computer science education. However, analyses in previous studies have been limited to surveys with limited numbers of LOs and students. The lack of copious quantitative data on how LOs impact student learning makes detailed analysis of LO usefulness problematic. Using an empirical approach, we have studied a suite of LOs, comprehensive in both the content covered and the range of difficulty, deployed to CS1 courses from 2007-2010. We review previous work on predictors of achievement and impact of active learning and feedback. We also provide a high-level overview of our LO deployment. Finally, based on our analysis of student interaction data, we found that (1) students using LOs have significantly higher assessment scores than the control group, (2) several student attributes are significant predictors of learning, (3) active learning has a significant effect on student assessment scores, and (4) feedback does not have a significant effect, but there are variables with significant moderating effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信