Наталија Н. Стојменовић
{"title":"ПРЕСУПОЗИЦИЈА ИЗРИЧАЈА СА ИТЕРАТИВНИМ ГЛАГОЛИМА У СРПСКОМ ЈЕЗИКУ","authors":"Наталија Н. Стојменовић","doi":"10.46630/phm.15.2023.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we are exploring the presupposition triggered by iterative verbs in the Serbian language. Our goal is to test presuppositions of iterative verbs in Serbian language, hence to check their similarity with iterative verbs in other languages and to classify them as hard or soft presupposition triggers. The main reason for this research comes from different perspectives on the phenomenon of presupposition and lack of papers in the Serbian language on the theme. We have tested ten verbs: vratiti, ponoviti, povratiti, kuckati, javljati se, lupkati, pribojavati se, došaptavati, ručavati and viđati. They have been compared using the neoreichenbachian model. We have used the corpus method and qualitative analysis. The research has shown that there is a need to differ repetitive verbs, which presuppose “the event has been realized at least once before“, from iterative verbs, which presuppose “the event has been realized at least twice before“. The difference between these groups of verbs is shown at the neoreichenbachian timeline: in the case of repetitive verbs the presupposition is left from the time of realisation and in the case of iterative verbs the presupposition is located inside that time. We have shown that each of the analised presuppositions remains after changing context, which is why we classifed them as hard triggers.","PeriodicalId":328718,"journal":{"name":"PHILOLOGIA MEDIANA","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOLOGIA MEDIANA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46630/phm.15.2023.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了塞尔维亚语中由迭代动词引发的预设。我们的目标是测试塞尔维亚语中迭代动词的预设,从而检查它们与其他语言中迭代动词的相似性,并将它们分类为硬或软预设触发器。本研究的主要原因是对预设现象的不同视角和塞尔维亚语中关于主题的论文的缺乏。我们测试了十个动词:vratii、ponoviti、povratii、kuckati、javljati se、lupkati、pribojavati se、došaptavati、ru avati和viđati。他们已经使用neoreichenbacachian模型进行了比较。我们采用了语料库法和定性分析。研究表明,有必要区分重复动词和迭代动词,前者预设“事件至少发生过一次”,后者预设“事件至少发生过两次”。这两组动词之间的差异显示在neoreichenbachian时间轴上:在重复动词的情况下,预设是从实现时间中留下的,而在迭代动词的情况下,预设位于该时间内。我们已经证明,每一个分析的预设在改变环境后仍然存在,这就是为什么我们将它们归类为硬触发因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ПРЕСУПОЗИЦИЈА ИЗРИЧАЈА СА ИТЕРАТИВНИМ ГЛАГОЛИМА У СРПСКОМ ЈЕЗИКУ
In this paper, we are exploring the presupposition triggered by iterative verbs in the Serbian language. Our goal is to test presuppositions of iterative verbs in Serbian language, hence to check their similarity with iterative verbs in other languages and to classify them as hard or soft presupposition triggers. The main reason for this research comes from different perspectives on the phenomenon of presupposition and lack of papers in the Serbian language on the theme. We have tested ten verbs: vratiti, ponoviti, povratiti, kuckati, javljati se, lupkati, pribojavati se, došaptavati, ručavati and viđati. They have been compared using the neoreichenbachian model. We have used the corpus method and qualitative analysis. The research has shown that there is a need to differ repetitive verbs, which presuppose “the event has been realized at least once before“, from iterative verbs, which presuppose “the event has been realized at least twice before“. The difference between these groups of verbs is shown at the neoreichenbachian timeline: in the case of repetitive verbs the presupposition is left from the time of realisation and in the case of iterative verbs the presupposition is located inside that time. We have shown that each of the analised presuppositions remains after changing context, which is why we classifed them as hard triggers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信