基于监督和非监督分类的文本挖掘安全相关Bug报告识别

K. Goseva-Popstojanova, Jacob Tyo
{"title":"基于监督和非监督分类的文本挖掘安全相关Bug报告识别","authors":"K. Goseva-Popstojanova, Jacob Tyo","doi":"10.1109/QRS.2018.00047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While many prior works used text mining for automating different tasks related to software bug reports, few works considered the security aspects. This paper is focused on automated classification of software bug reports to security and not-security related, using both supervised and unsupervised approaches. For both approaches, three types of feature vectors are used. For supervised learning, we experiment with multiple classifiers and training sets with different sizes. Furthermore, we propose a novel unsupervised approach based on anomaly detection. The evaluation is based on three NASA datasets. The results showed that supervised classification is affected more by the learning algorithms than by feature vectors and training only on 25% of the data provides as good results as training on 90% of the data. The supervised learning slightly outperforms the unsupervised learning, at the expense of labeling the training set. In general, datasets with more security information lead to better performance.","PeriodicalId":114973,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of Security Related Bug Reports via Text Mining Using Supervised and Unsupervised Classification\",\"authors\":\"K. Goseva-Popstojanova, Jacob Tyo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QRS.2018.00047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While many prior works used text mining for automating different tasks related to software bug reports, few works considered the security aspects. This paper is focused on automated classification of software bug reports to security and not-security related, using both supervised and unsupervised approaches. For both approaches, three types of feature vectors are used. For supervised learning, we experiment with multiple classifiers and training sets with different sizes. Furthermore, we propose a novel unsupervised approach based on anomaly detection. The evaluation is based on three NASA datasets. The results showed that supervised classification is affected more by the learning algorithms than by feature vectors and training only on 25% of the data provides as good results as training on 90% of the data. The supervised learning slightly outperforms the unsupervised learning, at the expense of labeling the training set. In general, datasets with more security information lead to better performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS.2018.00047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS.2018.00047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

摘要

虽然许多先前的工作使用文本挖掘来自动化与软件错误报告相关的不同任务,但很少有工作考虑到安全方面。本文的重点是使用监督和非监督两种方法,对软件缺陷报告的安全性和非安全性进行自动分类。对于这两种方法,使用了三种类型的特征向量。对于监督学习,我们使用不同大小的多个分类器和训练集进行实验。在此基础上,提出了一种新的基于异常检测的无监督方法。评估是基于NASA的三个数据集。结果表明,与特征向量相比,学习算法对监督分类的影响更大,仅在25%的数据上进行训练就能获得与在90%的数据上进行训练一样好的结果。监督学习略优于无监督学习,但代价是要标注训练集。通常,具有更多安全信息的数据集会带来更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of Security Related Bug Reports via Text Mining Using Supervised and Unsupervised Classification
While many prior works used text mining for automating different tasks related to software bug reports, few works considered the security aspects. This paper is focused on automated classification of software bug reports to security and not-security related, using both supervised and unsupervised approaches. For both approaches, three types of feature vectors are used. For supervised learning, we experiment with multiple classifiers and training sets with different sizes. Furthermore, we propose a novel unsupervised approach based on anomaly detection. The evaluation is based on three NASA datasets. The results showed that supervised classification is affected more by the learning algorithms than by feature vectors and training only on 25% of the data provides as good results as training on 90% of the data. The supervised learning slightly outperforms the unsupervised learning, at the expense of labeling the training set. In general, datasets with more security information lead to better performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信