{"title":"K. S. Bhat, Soma,和一个跨国的不信仰文学","authors":"S. Hobson","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192846471.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The final chapter provides an account of Soma (1931–4), the only little magazine from the period seemingly dedicated to the production and dissemination of a transnational literature of unbelief. The editor, K. S. Bhat, had links to the Rationalist Press Association as well as to progressive literary groups in London and India and these connections are manifest in the magazine’s hybridized literary style. This chapter explores some of Soma’s sources and influences from Indian literature and folklore, to Soviet realisms, and Anglophone modernisms. As Johannes Quack suggests in relation to his own work, the point of this approach is not to impose European values on Indian cultures, but to show how new formations of unbelief emerge at the point where different traditions intersect. In Soma, these formations often overlap with those seen in the British Rationalist context; the magazine gives priority to human values and flourishing over and above religious sensitivities and sanctions. But the magazine’s close affiliation with Eastern European and Indian sources and groups also produces new and distinctive formations. This chapter focuses on the parables and fables contributed by Bhat himself as exemplary of the magazine’s unique voice and contribution. Soma is a fitting place to end this book because, in both its conception and realization, the magazine extends the reach and the remit of what has thus far been considered under the heading of a literature of unbelief.","PeriodicalId":119552,"journal":{"name":"Unbelief in Interwar Literary Culture","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"K. S. Bhat, Soma, and a Transnational Literature of Unbelief\",\"authors\":\"S. Hobson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780192846471.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The final chapter provides an account of Soma (1931–4), the only little magazine from the period seemingly dedicated to the production and dissemination of a transnational literature of unbelief. The editor, K. S. Bhat, had links to the Rationalist Press Association as well as to progressive literary groups in London and India and these connections are manifest in the magazine’s hybridized literary style. This chapter explores some of Soma’s sources and influences from Indian literature and folklore, to Soviet realisms, and Anglophone modernisms. As Johannes Quack suggests in relation to his own work, the point of this approach is not to impose European values on Indian cultures, but to show how new formations of unbelief emerge at the point where different traditions intersect. In Soma, these formations often overlap with those seen in the British Rationalist context; the magazine gives priority to human values and flourishing over and above religious sensitivities and sanctions. But the magazine’s close affiliation with Eastern European and Indian sources and groups also produces new and distinctive formations. This chapter focuses on the parables and fables contributed by Bhat himself as exemplary of the magazine’s unique voice and contribution. Soma is a fitting place to end this book because, in both its conception and realization, the magazine extends the reach and the remit of what has thus far been considered under the heading of a literature of unbelief.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unbelief in Interwar Literary Culture\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unbelief in Interwar Literary Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846471.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unbelief in Interwar Literary Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846471.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最后一章讲述了《Soma》(1931-4)的故事,这是那个时期唯一一本似乎致力于制作和传播非信仰跨国文学的小杂志。编辑k·s·巴特(K. S. Bhat)与理性主义新闻协会(Rationalist Press Association)以及伦敦和印度的进步文学团体都有联系,这些联系体现在该杂志混杂的文学风格上。本章探讨了Soma的一些来源和影响,从印度文学和民间传说,到苏联现实主义,英语国家的现代主义。正如Johannes Quack在他自己的作品中提出的那样,这种方法的重点不是将欧洲价值观强加给印度文化,而是展示在不同传统相交的地方,新的不信仰形式是如何出现的。在Soma中,这些形式经常与英国理性主义背景中的形式重叠;该杂志将人类价值和繁荣置于宗教敏感性和制裁之上。但该杂志与东欧和印度来源和团体的密切联系也产生了新的和独特的形式。本章着重于巴特本人所创作的比喻和寓言,作为该杂志独特的声音和贡献的典范。Soma是这本书的一个合适的结尾,因为在它的概念和实现上,这本杂志扩展了迄今为止被认为是在无信仰文学的标题下的范围和范围。
K. S. Bhat, Soma, and a Transnational Literature of Unbelief
The final chapter provides an account of Soma (1931–4), the only little magazine from the period seemingly dedicated to the production and dissemination of a transnational literature of unbelief. The editor, K. S. Bhat, had links to the Rationalist Press Association as well as to progressive literary groups in London and India and these connections are manifest in the magazine’s hybridized literary style. This chapter explores some of Soma’s sources and influences from Indian literature and folklore, to Soviet realisms, and Anglophone modernisms. As Johannes Quack suggests in relation to his own work, the point of this approach is not to impose European values on Indian cultures, but to show how new formations of unbelief emerge at the point where different traditions intersect. In Soma, these formations often overlap with those seen in the British Rationalist context; the magazine gives priority to human values and flourishing over and above religious sensitivities and sanctions. But the magazine’s close affiliation with Eastern European and Indian sources and groups also produces new and distinctive formations. This chapter focuses on the parables and fables contributed by Bhat himself as exemplary of the magazine’s unique voice and contribution. Soma is a fitting place to end this book because, in both its conception and realization, the magazine extends the reach and the remit of what has thus far been considered under the heading of a literature of unbelief.