发展空间系统启发技术的风险知情设计实践

B. J. Franzini, B. Putney
{"title":"发展空间系统启发技术的风险知情设计实践","authors":"B. J. Franzini, B. Putney","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2010.5448024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The environment designers must conquer to realize crewed space-exploration initiatives presents a heavily mass constrained design space coupled with immense consequences given hardware failures. The balance of these two highly dependent design elements throughout the design process requires insights provided through reliability and risk assessments at early stages of system concept development. If reliability impacts are not analyzed, designers often apply too much redundancy to ensure crew safety or apply too little redundancy or failure mitigation hardware to ensure they meet mass requirements imposed by mission designers. Understanding what the addition of mass to a design is buying you, from a performance as well as reliability perspective, can ensure design trades are being made with a risk-informed perspective. The technique discussed in this paper conveys a method of risk-informed design that is guided by system design documents and based heavily on face-to-face designer interaction and elicitation. This approach proved very efficient, as designers were closely engaged early in design cycles and forced to focus on reliability strategies that were heavily influenced and implemented by the designer's own expertise.","PeriodicalId":299782,"journal":{"name":"2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developmental space-system elicitation techniques for risk-informed design practices\",\"authors\":\"B. J. Franzini, B. Putney\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.2010.5448024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The environment designers must conquer to realize crewed space-exploration initiatives presents a heavily mass constrained design space coupled with immense consequences given hardware failures. The balance of these two highly dependent design elements throughout the design process requires insights provided through reliability and risk assessments at early stages of system concept development. If reliability impacts are not analyzed, designers often apply too much redundancy to ensure crew safety or apply too little redundancy or failure mitigation hardware to ensure they meet mass requirements imposed by mission designers. Understanding what the addition of mass to a design is buying you, from a performance as well as reliability perspective, can ensure design trades are being made with a risk-informed perspective. The technique discussed in this paper conveys a method of risk-informed design that is guided by system design documents and based heavily on face-to-face designer interaction and elicitation. This approach proved very efficient, as designers were closely engaged early in design cycles and forced to focus on reliability strategies that were heavily influenced and implemented by the designer's own expertise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2010.5448024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2010.5448024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了实现载人太空探索计划,设计师必须征服的环境是一个质量严重受限的设计空间,加上硬件故障带来的巨大后果。在整个设计过程中,这两个高度依赖的设计元素的平衡需要在系统概念开发的早期阶段通过可靠性和风险评估提供洞察力。如果不分析可靠性影响,设计人员通常会采用过多的冗余来确保机组人员的安全,或者采用过少的冗余或故障缓解硬件来确保它们满足任务设计人员施加的大量要求。从性能和可靠性的角度来看,了解设计质量的增加会给你带来什么,可以确保在进行设计交易时考虑到风险。本文讨论的技术传达了一种风险知情设计的方法,该方法由系统设计文档指导,并在很大程度上基于面对面的设计师交互和启发。这种方法被证明是非常有效的,因为设计师在设计周期的早期密切参与,并被迫专注于可靠性策略,这些策略受到设计师自身专业知识的严重影响和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developmental space-system elicitation techniques for risk-informed design practices
The environment designers must conquer to realize crewed space-exploration initiatives presents a heavily mass constrained design space coupled with immense consequences given hardware failures. The balance of these two highly dependent design elements throughout the design process requires insights provided through reliability and risk assessments at early stages of system concept development. If reliability impacts are not analyzed, designers often apply too much redundancy to ensure crew safety or apply too little redundancy or failure mitigation hardware to ensure they meet mass requirements imposed by mission designers. Understanding what the addition of mass to a design is buying you, from a performance as well as reliability perspective, can ensure design trades are being made with a risk-informed perspective. The technique discussed in this paper conveys a method of risk-informed design that is guided by system design documents and based heavily on face-to-face designer interaction and elicitation. This approach proved very efficient, as designers were closely engaged early in design cycles and forced to focus on reliability strategies that were heavily influenced and implemented by the designer's own expertise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信