研究设计:必要的拼贴

Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research Pub Date : 2011-08-08 DOI:10.1145/2016911.2016919

S. Fincher, J. Tenenberg, A. Robins

{"title":"研究设计:必要的拼贴","authors":"S. Fincher, J. Tenenberg, A. Robins","doi":"10.1145/2016911.2016919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we suggest that in order to advance, the field of computer science education needs to craft its own research methods, to augment the borrowing of \"traditional\" methods such as semi-structured interviews and surveys from other research traditions. Two example instruments used in our recent research are discussed. We adopt the metaphor of \"bricolage\" to characterise not only what researchers do, but to argue that this may be a necessary step towards developing theory.","PeriodicalId":268925,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research design: necessary bricolage\",\"authors\":\"S. Fincher, J. Tenenberg, A. Robins\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2016911.2016919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we suggest that in order to advance, the field of computer science education needs to craft its own research methods, to augment the borrowing of \\\"traditional\\\" methods such as semi-structured interviews and surveys from other research traditions. Two example instruments used in our recent research are discussed. We adopt the metaphor of \\\"bricolage\\\" to characterise not only what researchers do, but to argue that this may be a necessary step towards developing theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":268925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2016911.2016919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2016911.2016919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 24

摘要

在本文中，我们建议为了进步，计算机科学教育领域需要制定自己的研究方法，以增加从其他研究传统中借用“传统”方法，如半结构化访谈和调查。讨论了我们最近研究中使用的两个例子仪器。我们采用“拼凑”这个比喻，不仅是为了描述研究人员的工作，也是为了说明这可能是发展理论的必要步骤。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Research design: necessary bricolage

In this paper we suggest that in order to advance, the field of computer science education needs to craft its own research methods, to augment the borrowing of "traditional" methods such as semi-structured interviews and surveys from other research traditions. Two example instruments used in our recent research are discussed. We adopt the metaphor of "bricolage" to characterise not only what researchers do, but to argue that this may be a necessary step towards developing theory.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research

自引率

0.00%

发文量