{"title":"验证流水线微处理器","authors":"P. J. Windley","doi":"10.1109/ASPDAC.1995.486362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently there has been much research in verifying pipelined microprocessors. Even so, there has been little consensus on what form the correctness statement should take. Put another way, what should we be verifying about pipelined microprocessors? We believe that the correctness statement should show that the parallel machine represented by the pipeline behaves in the same manner as the sequential machine represented by the instruction set semantics. In this paper, we present such a model and examine four pipeline verifications to see how they compare.","PeriodicalId":119232,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of ASP-DAC'95/CHDL'95/VLSI'95 with EDA Technofair","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verifying pipelined microprocessors\",\"authors\":\"P. J. Windley\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASPDAC.1995.486362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently there has been much research in verifying pipelined microprocessors. Even so, there has been little consensus on what form the correctness statement should take. Put another way, what should we be verifying about pipelined microprocessors? We believe that the correctness statement should show that the parallel machine represented by the pipeline behaves in the same manner as the sequential machine represented by the instruction set semantics. In this paper, we present such a model and examine four pipeline verifications to see how they compare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of ASP-DAC'95/CHDL'95/VLSI'95 with EDA Technofair\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of ASP-DAC'95/CHDL'95/VLSI'95 with EDA Technofair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASPDAC.1995.486362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of ASP-DAC'95/CHDL'95/VLSI'95 with EDA Technofair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASPDAC.1995.486362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recently there has been much research in verifying pipelined microprocessors. Even so, there has been little consensus on what form the correctness statement should take. Put another way, what should we be verifying about pipelined microprocessors? We believe that the correctness statement should show that the parallel machine represented by the pipeline behaves in the same manner as the sequential machine represented by the instruction set semantics. In this paper, we present such a model and examine four pipeline verifications to see how they compare.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
