集体构思与脑力写作——同地协作与远程协作的比较

DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th - 9th September 2022 Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.35199/epde.2022.19

M. Voss, Hulusi Bozkurt, T. Sauer, Marc Nutzmann

{"title":"集体构思与脑力写作——同地协作与远程协作的比较","authors":"M. Voss, Hulusi Bozkurt, T. Sauer, Marc Nutzmann","doi":"10.35199/epde.2022.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the influence of physical proximity (co-location vs. distance) and the medium (paper vs. online) on idea generation. It especially focusses on a popular brainwriting technique – namely Method 6-3-5. For this, an experiment with altogether 𝑁 = 134 Engineering Design students was conducted. The results show that the mode of interaction generally does not bias the quantity of ideas generated, but that the rate of graphical representations drops slightly.","PeriodicalId":147286,"journal":{"name":"DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th - 9th September 2022","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GROUP IDEATION WITH BRAINWRITING – A COMPARISON OF CO-LOCATED AND DISTANCE COLLABORATION\",\"authors\":\"M. Voss, Hulusi Bozkurt, T. Sauer, Marc Nutzmann\",\"doi\":\"10.35199/epde.2022.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the influence of physical proximity (co-location vs. distance) and the medium (paper vs. online) on idea generation. It especially focusses on a popular brainwriting technique – namely Method 6-3-5. For this, an experiment with altogether 𝑁 = 134 Engineering Design students was conducted. The results show that the mode of interaction generally does not bias the quantity of ideas generated, but that the rate of graphical representations drops slightly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th - 9th September 2022\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th - 9th September 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2022.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th - 9th September 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2022.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了物理距离(同处一地vs.距离)和媒介(纸媒vs.网络)对创意产生的影响。它特别关注一种流行的大脑写作技巧——即6-3-5方法。为此，我们对总共134名工程设计专业的学生进行了实验。结果表明，交互模式通常不会影响产生的想法数量，但图形表示的比率略有下降。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

GROUP IDEATION WITH BRAINWRITING – A COMPARISON OF CO-LOCATED AND DISTANCE COLLABORATION

This article examines the influence of physical proximity (co-location vs. distance) and the medium (paper vs. online) on idea generation. It especially focusses on a popular brainwriting technique – namely Method 6-3-5. For this, an experiment with altogether 𝑁 = 134 Engineering Design students was conducted. The results show that the mode of interaction generally does not bias the quantity of ideas generated, but that the rate of graphical representations drops slightly.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th - 9th September 2022

自引率

0.00%

发文量