民间定理神话背后的真相

Joseph Y. Halpern, R. Pass, Lior Seeman
{"title":"民间定理神话背后的真相","authors":"Joseph Y. Halpern, R. Pass, Lior Seeman","doi":"10.1145/2554797.2554847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the problem of computing an ε-Nash equilibrium in repeated games. Earlier work by Borgs et al. [2010] suggests that this problem is intractable. We show that if we make a slight change to their model---modeling the players as polynomial-time Turing machines that maintain state (rather than stateless polynomial-time Turing machines)---and make some standard cryptographic hardness assumptions (the existence of public key encryption), the problem can actually be solved in polynomial time.","PeriodicalId":382856,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th conference on Innovations in theoretical computer science","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The truth behind the myth of the folk theorem\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Y. Halpern, R. Pass, Lior Seeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2554797.2554847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the problem of computing an ε-Nash equilibrium in repeated games. Earlier work by Borgs et al. [2010] suggests that this problem is intractable. We show that if we make a slight change to their model---modeling the players as polynomial-time Turing machines that maintain state (rather than stateless polynomial-time Turing machines)---and make some standard cryptographic hardness assumptions (the existence of public key encryption), the problem can actually be solved in polynomial time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 5th conference on Innovations in theoretical computer science\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 5th conference on Innovations in theoretical computer science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2554797.2554847\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th conference on Innovations in theoretical computer science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2554797.2554847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

研究了重复博弈中ε-纳什均衡的计算问题。Borgs等人[2010]的早期研究表明,这个问题很难解决。我们表明,如果我们对他们的模型做一点改变——将参与者建模为保持状态的多项式时间图灵机(而不是无状态的多项式时间图灵机)——并做出一些标准的加密硬度假设(公钥加密的存在),这个问题实际上可以在多项式时间内解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The truth behind the myth of the folk theorem
We study the problem of computing an ε-Nash equilibrium in repeated games. Earlier work by Borgs et al. [2010] suggests that this problem is intractable. We show that if we make a slight change to their model---modeling the players as polynomial-time Turing machines that maintain state (rather than stateless polynomial-time Turing machines)---and make some standard cryptographic hardness assumptions (the existence of public key encryption), the problem can actually be solved in polynomial time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信