使用术语反馈优化网络搜索:基于日志的研究

Peter G. Anick
{"title":"使用术语反馈优化网络搜索:基于日志的研究","authors":"Peter G. Anick","doi":"10.1145/860435.860453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although interactive query reformulation has been actively studied in the laboratory, little is known about the actual behavior of web searchers who are offered terminological feedback along with their search results. We analyze log sessions for two groups of users interacting with variants of the AltaVista search engine - a baseline group given no terminological feedback and a feedback group to whom twelve refinement terms are offered along with the search results. We examine uptake, refinement effectiveness, conditions of use, and refinement type preferences. Although our measure of overall session \"success\" shows no difference between outcomes for the two groups, we find evidence that a subset of those users presented with terminological feedback do make effective use of it on a continuing basis.","PeriodicalId":209809,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"335","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using terminological feedback for web search refinement: a log-based study\",\"authors\":\"Peter G. Anick\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/860435.860453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although interactive query reformulation has been actively studied in the laboratory, little is known about the actual behavior of web searchers who are offered terminological feedback along with their search results. We analyze log sessions for two groups of users interacting with variants of the AltaVista search engine - a baseline group given no terminological feedback and a feedback group to whom twelve refinement terms are offered along with the search results. We examine uptake, refinement effectiveness, conditions of use, and refinement type preferences. Although our measure of overall session \\\"success\\\" shows no difference between outcomes for the two groups, we find evidence that a subset of those users presented with terminological feedback do make effective use of it on a continuing basis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":209809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"335\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/860435.860453\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/860435.860453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 335

摘要

尽管交互式查询重新表述已经在实验室中得到了积极的研究,但对于在搜索结果中提供术语反馈的网络搜索者的实际行为知之甚少。我们分析了两组用户与AltaVista搜索引擎变体交互的日志会话——一个基线组没有给出术语反馈,另一个反馈组给出了12个精炼术语和搜索结果。我们检查摄取,改进的有效性,使用条件和改进类型的偏好。尽管我们对整体会话“成功”的测量显示两组结果之间没有差异,但我们发现有证据表明,那些获得术语反馈的用户中的一部分确实在持续的基础上有效地使用了它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using terminological feedback for web search refinement: a log-based study
Although interactive query reformulation has been actively studied in the laboratory, little is known about the actual behavior of web searchers who are offered terminological feedback along with their search results. We analyze log sessions for two groups of users interacting with variants of the AltaVista search engine - a baseline group given no terminological feedback and a feedback group to whom twelve refinement terms are offered along with the search results. We examine uptake, refinement effectiveness, conditions of use, and refinement type preferences. Although our measure of overall session "success" shows no difference between outcomes for the two groups, we find evidence that a subset of those users presented with terminological feedback do make effective use of it on a continuing basis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信