Moodle讨论作为评估障碍:一位香港获奖教师的LMS实践

Jing Wang
{"title":"Moodle讨论作为评估障碍:一位香港获奖教师的LMS实践","authors":"Jing Wang","doi":"10.1109/ICIET55102.2022.9778947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper sets out to depict an award-winning teacher's Moodle design as assessment hurdle and explore students' actual experience with such design in a Hong Kong university context. The rich qualitative data, drawn from classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and documents, shows that the voluntary nature of Moodle task without clear assessment criteria discouraged students' participation. Two pertinent issues were discussed concerning building disciplinary community and teacher-facilitated versus student-facilitated discussion. However exploratory, the perspectives regarding various pedagogical practices and dilemmas on web-based learning, and pedagogical insights that emerged from the specific setting may carry resonance for teachers and researchers in Hong Kong context and beyond.","PeriodicalId":371262,"journal":{"name":"2022 10th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moodle Discussion as Assessment Hurdle: Insights from a Hong Kong Award-winning Teacher's LMS Practices\",\"authors\":\"Jing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIET55102.2022.9778947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper sets out to depict an award-winning teacher's Moodle design as assessment hurdle and explore students' actual experience with such design in a Hong Kong university context. The rich qualitative data, drawn from classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and documents, shows that the voluntary nature of Moodle task without clear assessment criteria discouraged students' participation. Two pertinent issues were discussed concerning building disciplinary community and teacher-facilitated versus student-facilitated discussion. However exploratory, the perspectives regarding various pedagogical practices and dilemmas on web-based learning, and pedagogical insights that emerged from the specific setting may carry resonance for teachers and researchers in Hong Kong context and beyond.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 10th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 10th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET55102.2022.9778947\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 10th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET55102.2022.9778947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文以一位获奖教师的Moodle设计作为评估障碍,并在香港大学的背景下探讨学生对这种设计的实际体验。从课堂观察、半结构化访谈和文献中得出的丰富定性数据表明,Moodle任务的自愿性没有明确的评估标准,阻碍了学生的参与。讨论了建立学科共同体和教师促进与学生促进讨论的两个相关问题。尽管具有探索性,但从特定环境中产生的关于网络学习的各种教学实践和困境的观点,以及教学见解,可能会引起香港及其他地区教师和研究人员的共鸣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moodle Discussion as Assessment Hurdle: Insights from a Hong Kong Award-winning Teacher's LMS Practices
This paper sets out to depict an award-winning teacher's Moodle design as assessment hurdle and explore students' actual experience with such design in a Hong Kong university context. The rich qualitative data, drawn from classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and documents, shows that the voluntary nature of Moodle task without clear assessment criteria discouraged students' participation. Two pertinent issues were discussed concerning building disciplinary community and teacher-facilitated versus student-facilitated discussion. However exploratory, the perspectives regarding various pedagogical practices and dilemmas on web-based learning, and pedagogical insights that emerged from the specific setting may carry resonance for teachers and researchers in Hong Kong context and beyond.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信