常识的普遍错误:会计方法的必要修正

Egmont Kakarot-Handtke
{"title":"常识的普遍错误:会计方法的必要修正","authors":"Egmont Kakarot-Handtke","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2153218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper takes the explanatory superiority of the integrated monetary\napproach for granted. It will be demonstrated that the accounting approach\ncould do even better provided it frees itself from theoretically ill-founded\nnotions like GDP and other artifacts of the equilibrium approach. National\naccounting as such does not provide a model of the economy but is the numerical\nreflex of the underlying theory. It is this theory that will be scrutinized,\nrectified and ultimately replaced in the following. The formal point of reference\nis ‘the integrated approach to credit, money, income, production and\nwealth’ of Godley and Lavoie.","PeriodicalId":398400,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: National Income & Product Accounts (Topic)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Common Error of Common Sense: An Essential Rectification of the Accounting Approach\",\"authors\":\"Egmont Kakarot-Handtke\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2153218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present paper takes the explanatory superiority of the integrated monetary\\napproach for granted. It will be demonstrated that the accounting approach\\ncould do even better provided it frees itself from theoretically ill-founded\\nnotions like GDP and other artifacts of the equilibrium approach. National\\naccounting as such does not provide a model of the economy but is the numerical\\nreflex of the underlying theory. It is this theory that will be scrutinized,\\nrectified and ultimately replaced in the following. The formal point of reference\\nis ‘the integrated approach to credit, money, income, production and\\nwealth’ of Godley and Lavoie.\",\"PeriodicalId\":398400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: National Income & Product Accounts (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: National Income & Product Accounts (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2153218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: National Income & Product Accounts (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2153218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文认为综合货币方法的解释性优势是理所当然的。它将证明,会计方法可以做得更好,只要它从理论上没有根据的概念,如GDP和均衡方法的其他人工制品中解脱出来。国民核算本身并不提供经济模型,而是基础理论的数字反映。正是这一理论将在下文中被仔细审查、纠正并最终取代。正式的参考点是Godley和Lavoie的“信贷、货币、收入、生产和财富的综合方法”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Common Error of Common Sense: An Essential Rectification of the Accounting Approach
The present paper takes the explanatory superiority of the integrated monetary approach for granted. It will be demonstrated that the accounting approach could do even better provided it frees itself from theoretically ill-founded notions like GDP and other artifacts of the equilibrium approach. National accounting as such does not provide a model of the economy but is the numerical reflex of the underlying theory. It is this theory that will be scrutinized, rectified and ultimately replaced in the following. The formal point of reference is ‘the integrated approach to credit, money, income, production and wealth’ of Godley and Lavoie.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信