在流行病危机期间,政治家如何谈论经济政策?来自新兴国家和发达国家的证据

Indri Dwi Apriliyanti, Cinintya Audori Fathin
{"title":"在流行病危机期间,政治家如何谈论经济政策?来自新兴国家和发达国家的证据","authors":"Indri Dwi Apriliyanti, Cinintya Audori Fathin","doi":"10.21098/jcli.v1i2.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our study explores economic policy communication in response to the Covid-19 pandemic crisis. Considering a major role of Twitter in information dissemination, we use tweets as a proxy to examine politicians’ crisis communication strategies in five countries, Australia, Canada, India, Indonesia, and Singapore. By using systematic content analysis approach, the study attested the degree to which SCCT and IRT model can be applied to political realm. We found two strategies, bolstering and mortification, emerge as the most frequently used strategies by politicians. Further, new strategies, i.e information provision and cohesion, as well as new categories, i.e morale boosting, political positioning, and cross border cooperation surfaced which further expanding the SCCT and IRT model in explaining political crisis communication. As this study explores the role of context and situational factors that determine specific strategies, our findings demonstrate no substantial differences among developed and emerging countries. We note the use of combination of bolstering, mortification, and cohesion strategies can be critical for politicians’ career, as they may restore politicians’ reputation, reinforce their political presentation, and foster public trust.","PeriodicalId":292753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Do Politicians Speak About Economic Policy During Pandemic Crisis? Evidence From Emerging and Developed Countries\",\"authors\":\"Indri Dwi Apriliyanti, Cinintya Audori Fathin\",\"doi\":\"10.21098/jcli.v1i2.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our study explores economic policy communication in response to the Covid-19 pandemic crisis. Considering a major role of Twitter in information dissemination, we use tweets as a proxy to examine politicians’ crisis communication strategies in five countries, Australia, Canada, India, Indonesia, and Singapore. By using systematic content analysis approach, the study attested the degree to which SCCT and IRT model can be applied to political realm. We found two strategies, bolstering and mortification, emerge as the most frequently used strategies by politicians. Further, new strategies, i.e information provision and cohesion, as well as new categories, i.e morale boosting, political positioning, and cross border cooperation surfaced which further expanding the SCCT and IRT model in explaining political crisis communication. As this study explores the role of context and situational factors that determine specific strategies, our findings demonstrate no substantial differences among developed and emerging countries. We note the use of combination of bolstering, mortification, and cohesion strategies can be critical for politicians’ career, as they may restore politicians’ reputation, reinforce their political presentation, and foster public trust.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v1i2.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v1i2.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的研究探讨了应对Covid-19大流行危机的经济政策沟通。考虑到推特在信息传播中的重要作用,我们以推特作为代理来研究澳大利亚、加拿大、印度、印度尼西亚和新加坡五个国家的政治家的危机沟通策略。采用系统的内容分析方法,验证了SCCT和IRT模型在政治领域的适用程度。我们发现两种策略,支持和羞辱,是政治家们最常用的策略。此外,信息提供和凝聚力等新策略以及士气提升、政治定位、跨界合作等新范畴的出现,进一步拓展了SCCT和IRT模型对政治危机传播的解释。由于本研究探讨了决定具体策略的背景和情境因素的作用,我们的研究结果表明,在发达国家和新兴国家之间没有实质性差异。我们注意到,使用支持、羞辱和凝聚策略的组合对政治家的职业生涯至关重要,因为它们可以恢复政治家的声誉,加强他们的政治表现,并培养公众的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Do Politicians Speak About Economic Policy During Pandemic Crisis? Evidence From Emerging and Developed Countries
Our study explores economic policy communication in response to the Covid-19 pandemic crisis. Considering a major role of Twitter in information dissemination, we use tweets as a proxy to examine politicians’ crisis communication strategies in five countries, Australia, Canada, India, Indonesia, and Singapore. By using systematic content analysis approach, the study attested the degree to which SCCT and IRT model can be applied to political realm. We found two strategies, bolstering and mortification, emerge as the most frequently used strategies by politicians. Further, new strategies, i.e information provision and cohesion, as well as new categories, i.e morale boosting, political positioning, and cross border cooperation surfaced which further expanding the SCCT and IRT model in explaining political crisis communication. As this study explores the role of context and situational factors that determine specific strategies, our findings demonstrate no substantial differences among developed and emerging countries. We note the use of combination of bolstering, mortification, and cohesion strategies can be critical for politicians’ career, as they may restore politicians’ reputation, reinforce their political presentation, and foster public trust.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信