SoK:区块链时代的共识

S. Bano, A. Sonnino, Mustafa Al-Bassam, Sarah Azouvi, Patrick McCorry, S. Meiklejohn, G. Danezis
{"title":"SoK:区块链时代的共识","authors":"S. Bano, A. Sonnino, Mustafa Al-Bassam, Sarah Azouvi, Patrick McCorry, S. Meiklejohn, G. Danezis","doi":"10.1145/3318041.3355458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The core technical component of blockchains is consensus: how to reach agreement among a distributed network of nodes. A plethora of blockchain consensus protocols have been proposed---ranging from new designs, to novel modifications and extensions of consensus protocols from the classical distributed systems literature. The inherent complexity of consensus protocols and their rapid and dramatic evolution makes it hard to contextualize the design landscape. We address this challenge by conducting a systematization of knowledge of blockchain consensus protocols. After first discussing key themes in classical consensus protocols, we describe: (i) protocols based on proof-of-work; (ii) proof-of-X protocols that replace proof-of-work with more energy-efficient alternatives; and (iii) hybrid protocols that are compositions or variations of classical consensus protocols. This survey is guided by a systematization framework we develop, to highlight the various building blocks of blockchain consensus design, along with a discussion on their security and performance properties. We identify research gaps and insights for the community to consider in future research endeavours.","PeriodicalId":326009,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"399","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SoK: Consensus in the Age of Blockchains\",\"authors\":\"S. Bano, A. Sonnino, Mustafa Al-Bassam, Sarah Azouvi, Patrick McCorry, S. Meiklejohn, G. Danezis\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3318041.3355458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The core technical component of blockchains is consensus: how to reach agreement among a distributed network of nodes. A plethora of blockchain consensus protocols have been proposed---ranging from new designs, to novel modifications and extensions of consensus protocols from the classical distributed systems literature. The inherent complexity of consensus protocols and their rapid and dramatic evolution makes it hard to contextualize the design landscape. We address this challenge by conducting a systematization of knowledge of blockchain consensus protocols. After first discussing key themes in classical consensus protocols, we describe: (i) protocols based on proof-of-work; (ii) proof-of-X protocols that replace proof-of-work with more energy-efficient alternatives; and (iii) hybrid protocols that are compositions or variations of classical consensus protocols. This survey is guided by a systematization framework we develop, to highlight the various building blocks of blockchain consensus design, along with a discussion on their security and performance properties. We identify research gaps and insights for the community to consider in future research endeavours.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"399\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3318041.3355458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3318041.3355458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 399

摘要

区块链的核心技术组件是共识:如何在分布式节点网络之间达成协议。已经提出了大量的区块链共识协议——从新设计到经典分布式系统文献中共识协议的新修改和扩展。共识协议固有的复杂性及其快速而戏剧性的演变使得很难将设计环境置于背景中。我们通过对区块链共识协议的知识进行系统化来应对这一挑战。在首先讨论经典共识协议中的关键主题之后,我们描述了:(i)基于工作量证明的协议;(ii)用更节能的替代方案取代工作量证明的x证明协议;以及(iii)混合协议,它是经典共识协议的组合或变体。本调查以我们开发的系统化框架为指导,以突出区块链共识设计的各种构建块,并讨论其安全性和性能属性。我们确定研究差距和见解,供社区在未来的研究工作中考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SoK: Consensus in the Age of Blockchains
The core technical component of blockchains is consensus: how to reach agreement among a distributed network of nodes. A plethora of blockchain consensus protocols have been proposed---ranging from new designs, to novel modifications and extensions of consensus protocols from the classical distributed systems literature. The inherent complexity of consensus protocols and their rapid and dramatic evolution makes it hard to contextualize the design landscape. We address this challenge by conducting a systematization of knowledge of blockchain consensus protocols. After first discussing key themes in classical consensus protocols, we describe: (i) protocols based on proof-of-work; (ii) proof-of-X protocols that replace proof-of-work with more energy-efficient alternatives; and (iii) hybrid protocols that are compositions or variations of classical consensus protocols. This survey is guided by a systematization framework we develop, to highlight the various building blocks of blockchain consensus design, along with a discussion on their security and performance properties. We identify research gaps and insights for the community to consider in future research endeavours.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信