CAPM与APT模型在Covid-19大流行期间预测IDX-30股票收益准确性的比较分析

Siji Jati Sindhuarta, Ricky Albert Husni, Tumpal Samosir
{"title":"CAPM与APT模型在Covid-19大流行期间预测IDX-30股票收益准确性的比较分析","authors":"Siji Jati Sindhuarta, Ricky Albert Husni, Tumpal Samosir","doi":"10.22441/indikator.v7i1.15992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is done to analyze and compare the accuracy of Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) Model in predicting stocks’ actual return. The purpose of the study is to find the discrepancy of accuracy of CAPM and APT models in predicting company stocks’ return registered in IDX-30 index from Indonesian Stock Exchange from January 2020-2022. The period is chosen because of the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. The chosen stocks are the stocks which have positive return, never leave the index, never have any changes in stocks’ amount in major and minor evaluation, never do stock split, and have routine dividend payout along the study’s period. The result is there is a significant difference between CAPM and APT models in predicting the actual return based on the result from t-test independent samples. Observed from the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) of the two models, CAPM model MAD is smaller than those from APT model, thus CAPM is the more accurate model in calculating return form IDX-30 stocks from January 2020-2022.","PeriodicalId":400933,"journal":{"name":"Indikator: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Bisnis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Analysis Between Accuracy of CAPM and APT Models in Predicting Return of IDX-30 Stocks during Covid-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Siji Jati Sindhuarta, Ricky Albert Husni, Tumpal Samosir\",\"doi\":\"10.22441/indikator.v7i1.15992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is done to analyze and compare the accuracy of Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) Model in predicting stocks’ actual return. The purpose of the study is to find the discrepancy of accuracy of CAPM and APT models in predicting company stocks’ return registered in IDX-30 index from Indonesian Stock Exchange from January 2020-2022. The period is chosen because of the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. The chosen stocks are the stocks which have positive return, never leave the index, never have any changes in stocks’ amount in major and minor evaluation, never do stock split, and have routine dividend payout along the study’s period. The result is there is a significant difference between CAPM and APT models in predicting the actual return based on the result from t-test independent samples. Observed from the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) of the two models, CAPM model MAD is smaller than those from APT model, thus CAPM is the more accurate model in calculating return form IDX-30 stocks from January 2020-2022.\",\"PeriodicalId\":400933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indikator: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Bisnis\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indikator: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Bisnis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22441/indikator.v7i1.15992\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indikator: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Bisnis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22441/indikator.v7i1.15992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对资本资产定价模型(CAPM)和套利定价理论模型(APT)预测股票实际收益的准确性进行了分析和比较。本研究的目的是找出CAPM和APT模型在预测2020年1月-2022年1月印尼证券交易所IDX-30指数公司股票收益的准确性差异。选择这一时期是因为印度尼西亚的Covid-19大流行。所选股票为收益率为正、从未脱离指数、在主要评估和次要评估中股票金额从未发生变化、从未进行过股票分割、在研究期间定期派息的股票。结果表明,基于t检验独立样本的结果,CAPM模型与APT模型在预测实际收益方面存在显著差异。从两种模型的平均绝对偏差(MAD)来看,CAPM模型的MAD比APT模型的MAD要小,因此在计算IDX-30股票2020年1月-2022年1月的收益时,CAPM模型更为准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Analysis Between Accuracy of CAPM and APT Models in Predicting Return of IDX-30 Stocks during Covid-19 Pandemic
This study is done to analyze and compare the accuracy of Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) Model in predicting stocks’ actual return. The purpose of the study is to find the discrepancy of accuracy of CAPM and APT models in predicting company stocks’ return registered in IDX-30 index from Indonesian Stock Exchange from January 2020-2022. The period is chosen because of the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. The chosen stocks are the stocks which have positive return, never leave the index, never have any changes in stocks’ amount in major and minor evaluation, never do stock split, and have routine dividend payout along the study’s period. The result is there is a significant difference between CAPM and APT models in predicting the actual return based on the result from t-test independent samples. Observed from the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) of the two models, CAPM model MAD is smaller than those from APT model, thus CAPM is the more accurate model in calculating return form IDX-30 stocks from January 2020-2022.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信