{"title":"一首忧郁的田园诗","authors":"V. Sukhnev","doi":"10.2753/RSL1061-197519020332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It's very symptomatic that S. Lesnevskii's article, which began this exchange, appears right next to material by A. Urban and G. Krasnikov, who are discussing Evgenii Evtushenko's narrative poem Mom and the Neutron Bomb [Mama i neitronnaia bomba]. Lesnevskii says that in our era book-events have become a rarity, that it seems as though no one is exclaiming, \"Look - the stars have again been decapitated….\" First of all, such books are rare precisely because they become events. This is how it has always been and always will be. Second, isn't Evtushenko's new long poem an event of that order? I'll note in passing that Krasnikov's position with regard to its poetic qualities is nearer to mine than Urban's. But with regard to Lesnevskii's thesis that not a single school of poetry in the last quarter-century has produced a poet of the epoch…. \"Large things can only be seen at a distance.\" Esenin is completely correct in this. The water of history should stand a little. At the moment we see in its impetuous stre...","PeriodicalId":173745,"journal":{"name":"Soviet Studies in Literature","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Melancholy Idyll\",\"authors\":\"V. Sukhnev\",\"doi\":\"10.2753/RSL1061-197519020332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It's very symptomatic that S. Lesnevskii's article, which began this exchange, appears right next to material by A. Urban and G. Krasnikov, who are discussing Evgenii Evtushenko's narrative poem Mom and the Neutron Bomb [Mama i neitronnaia bomba]. Lesnevskii says that in our era book-events have become a rarity, that it seems as though no one is exclaiming, \\\"Look - the stars have again been decapitated….\\\" First of all, such books are rare precisely because they become events. This is how it has always been and always will be. Second, isn't Evtushenko's new long poem an event of that order? I'll note in passing that Krasnikov's position with regard to its poetic qualities is nearer to mine than Urban's. But with regard to Lesnevskii's thesis that not a single school of poetry in the last quarter-century has produced a poet of the epoch…. \\\"Large things can only be seen at a distance.\\\" Esenin is completely correct in this. The water of history should stand a little. At the moment we see in its impetuous stre...\",\"PeriodicalId\":173745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soviet Studies in Literature\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soviet Studies in Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSL1061-197519020332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soviet Studies in Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSL1061-197519020332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
S. Lesnevskii的文章是这次交流的开端,它出现在A. Urban和G. Krasnikov的文章旁边,他们正在讨论Evgenii Evtushenko的叙事诗《妈妈和中子弹》(Mama i neitronnaia bomba)。列斯涅夫斯基说,在我们这个时代,书籍事件已经变得罕见,似乎没有人会惊呼,“看,星星又被斩首了....”。首先,这类书之所以罕见,正是因为它们成为了事件。它一直是这样,也将永远是这样。其次,叶夫图申科的新长诗不就是这样的事件吗?顺便说一句,克拉斯尼科夫对诗歌品质的看法比厄本更接近我。但是关于列斯涅夫斯基的论点在过去的四分之一世纪里没有一个诗歌流派产生了一个时代的诗人....“大的东西只有在远处才能看到。”在这一点上,爱赛宁是完全正确的。历史之水应稍存。此刻,我们在它的浮躁中看到……
It's very symptomatic that S. Lesnevskii's article, which began this exchange, appears right next to material by A. Urban and G. Krasnikov, who are discussing Evgenii Evtushenko's narrative poem Mom and the Neutron Bomb [Mama i neitronnaia bomba]. Lesnevskii says that in our era book-events have become a rarity, that it seems as though no one is exclaiming, "Look - the stars have again been decapitated…." First of all, such books are rare precisely because they become events. This is how it has always been and always will be. Second, isn't Evtushenko's new long poem an event of that order? I'll note in passing that Krasnikov's position with regard to its poetic qualities is nearer to mine than Urban's. But with regard to Lesnevskii's thesis that not a single school of poetry in the last quarter-century has produced a poet of the epoch…. "Large things can only be seen at a distance." Esenin is completely correct in this. The water of history should stand a little. At the moment we see in its impetuous stre...