一首忧郁的田园诗

V. Sukhnev
{"title":"一首忧郁的田园诗","authors":"V. Sukhnev","doi":"10.2753/RSL1061-197519020332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It's very symptomatic that S. Lesnevskii's article, which began this exchange, appears right next to material by A. Urban and G. Krasnikov, who are discussing Evgenii Evtushenko's narrative poem Mom and the Neutron Bomb [Mama i neitronnaia bomba]. Lesnevskii says that in our era book-events have become a rarity, that it seems as though no one is exclaiming, \"Look - the stars have again been decapitated….\" First of all, such books are rare precisely because they become events. This is how it has always been and always will be. Second, isn't Evtushenko's new long poem an event of that order? I'll note in passing that Krasnikov's position with regard to its poetic qualities is nearer to mine than Urban's. But with regard to Lesnevskii's thesis that not a single school of poetry in the last quarter-century has produced a poet of the epoch…. \"Large things can only be seen at a distance.\" Esenin is completely correct in this. The water of history should stand a little. At the moment we see in its impetuous stre...","PeriodicalId":173745,"journal":{"name":"Soviet Studies in Literature","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Melancholy Idyll\",\"authors\":\"V. Sukhnev\",\"doi\":\"10.2753/RSL1061-197519020332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It's very symptomatic that S. Lesnevskii's article, which began this exchange, appears right next to material by A. Urban and G. Krasnikov, who are discussing Evgenii Evtushenko's narrative poem Mom and the Neutron Bomb [Mama i neitronnaia bomba]. Lesnevskii says that in our era book-events have become a rarity, that it seems as though no one is exclaiming, \\\"Look - the stars have again been decapitated….\\\" First of all, such books are rare precisely because they become events. This is how it has always been and always will be. Second, isn't Evtushenko's new long poem an event of that order? I'll note in passing that Krasnikov's position with regard to its poetic qualities is nearer to mine than Urban's. But with regard to Lesnevskii's thesis that not a single school of poetry in the last quarter-century has produced a poet of the epoch…. \\\"Large things can only be seen at a distance.\\\" Esenin is completely correct in this. The water of history should stand a little. At the moment we see in its impetuous stre...\",\"PeriodicalId\":173745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soviet Studies in Literature\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soviet Studies in Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSL1061-197519020332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soviet Studies in Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSL1061-197519020332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

S. Lesnevskii的文章是这次交流的开端,它出现在A. Urban和G. Krasnikov的文章旁边,他们正在讨论Evgenii Evtushenko的叙事诗《妈妈和中子弹》(Mama i neitronnaia bomba)。列斯涅夫斯基说,在我们这个时代,书籍事件已经变得罕见,似乎没有人会惊呼,“看,星星又被斩首了....”。首先,这类书之所以罕见,正是因为它们成为了事件。它一直是这样,也将永远是这样。其次,叶夫图申科的新长诗不就是这样的事件吗?顺便说一句,克拉斯尼科夫对诗歌品质的看法比厄本更接近我。但是关于列斯涅夫斯基的论点在过去的四分之一世纪里没有一个诗歌流派产生了一个时代的诗人....“大的东西只有在远处才能看到。”在这一点上,爱赛宁是完全正确的。历史之水应稍存。此刻,我们在它的浮躁中看到……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Melancholy Idyll
It's very symptomatic that S. Lesnevskii's article, which began this exchange, appears right next to material by A. Urban and G. Krasnikov, who are discussing Evgenii Evtushenko's narrative poem Mom and the Neutron Bomb [Mama i neitronnaia bomba]. Lesnevskii says that in our era book-events have become a rarity, that it seems as though no one is exclaiming, "Look - the stars have again been decapitated…." First of all, such books are rare precisely because they become events. This is how it has always been and always will be. Second, isn't Evtushenko's new long poem an event of that order? I'll note in passing that Krasnikov's position with regard to its poetic qualities is nearer to mine than Urban's. But with regard to Lesnevskii's thesis that not a single school of poetry in the last quarter-century has produced a poet of the epoch…. "Large things can only be seen at a distance." Esenin is completely correct in this. The water of history should stand a little. At the moment we see in its impetuous stre...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信