在没有侧位x线的情况下,体表人体测量标志估计骨盆发病率的可靠性

Shota Yamada, T. Ebara, T. Uehara, S. Kimura, K. Aoki, A. Inada, M. Kamijima
{"title":"在没有侧位x线的情况下,体表人体测量标志估计骨盆发病率的可靠性","authors":"Shota Yamada, T. Ebara, T. Uehara, S. Kimura, K. Aoki, A. Inada, M. Kamijima","doi":"10.1539/EOHP.2019-0021-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Increasing attention has been paid to pelvic incidence (PI) as a potential parameter related to low back pain. However, little knowledge exists regarding potential anthropometric landmarks specialized for the estimation of PI. This study aimed to examine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of potential anthropometric landmarks applicable to estimate PI. Methods: Twenty healthcare workers were recruited as participants. Three were experienced physiotherapists for more than 5 years in clinical practice. Eight anatomical landmarks were selected: (1) the acromion, (2) the upper edge of the iliac crest, (3) the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), (4) the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), (5) the upper edge of the greater trochanter, (6) the coccyx, (7) the lateral joint space of the knee, and (8) the lateral malleolus. Photographs of the right-side view of the subjects were used to determine the two-dimensional ( x , y ) coordinates of the landmarks. Results: Most landmark measurements reached acceptable levels for intra-examiner (ICC 1 , 0.64 to 0.98) and inter-examiner reliability (ICC 3 , 0.71 to 0.97). However, as possible anatomical landmarks, the PSIS (ICC 1 0.65, ICC 3 0.48), acromion (ICC 3 0.66), and coccyx (ICC 1 0.64) tended to have relatively low ICCs. Conclusions: Our study suggests that potential anthropometric landmarks on the body surface examined on palpation have acceptable intra- and inter-examiner reliability; however, identifying the acromion, PSIS, and coccyx as anatomical landmarks using the measurement method in this study remain difficult to be considered reliable.","PeriodicalId":278195,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Occupational Health Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of anthropometric landmarks on body surface for estimating pelvic incidence without lateral X-ray\",\"authors\":\"Shota Yamada, T. Ebara, T. Uehara, S. Kimura, K. Aoki, A. Inada, M. Kamijima\",\"doi\":\"10.1539/EOHP.2019-0021-OA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Increasing attention has been paid to pelvic incidence (PI) as a potential parameter related to low back pain. However, little knowledge exists regarding potential anthropometric landmarks specialized for the estimation of PI. This study aimed to examine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of potential anthropometric landmarks applicable to estimate PI. Methods: Twenty healthcare workers were recruited as participants. Three were experienced physiotherapists for more than 5 years in clinical practice. Eight anatomical landmarks were selected: (1) the acromion, (2) the upper edge of the iliac crest, (3) the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), (4) the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), (5) the upper edge of the greater trochanter, (6) the coccyx, (7) the lateral joint space of the knee, and (8) the lateral malleolus. Photographs of the right-side view of the subjects were used to determine the two-dimensional ( x , y ) coordinates of the landmarks. Results: Most landmark measurements reached acceptable levels for intra-examiner (ICC 1 , 0.64 to 0.98) and inter-examiner reliability (ICC 3 , 0.71 to 0.97). However, as possible anatomical landmarks, the PSIS (ICC 1 0.65, ICC 3 0.48), acromion (ICC 3 0.66), and coccyx (ICC 1 0.64) tended to have relatively low ICCs. Conclusions: Our study suggests that potential anthropometric landmarks on the body surface examined on palpation have acceptable intra- and inter-examiner reliability; however, identifying the acromion, PSIS, and coccyx as anatomical landmarks using the measurement method in this study remain difficult to be considered reliable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":278195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Occupational Health Practice\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Occupational Health Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1539/EOHP.2019-0021-OA\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Occupational Health Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/EOHP.2019-0021-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:骨盆发生率(PI)作为与腰痛相关的潜在参数越来越受到关注。然而,关于专门用于估计PI的潜在人体测量标志的知识很少。本研究旨在检验适用于估计PI的潜在人体测量标志在审查员之间和审查员内部的可靠性。方法:招募20名医护人员作为研究对象。3名临床经验超过5年的物理治疗师。选择了8个解剖标志:(1)肩峰,(2)髂骨上缘,(3)髂后上棘(PSIS),(4)髂前上棘(ASIS),(5)大转子上缘,(6)尾骨,(7)膝关节外侧关节间隙,(8)外踝。研究人员使用受试者右侧视图的照片来确定地标的二维(x, y)坐标。结果:大多数标志性测量达到了审查员内部(ICC 1, 0.64至0.98)和审查员之间的信度(ICC 3, 0.71至0.97)的可接受水平。然而,作为可能的解剖标志,PSIS (ICC 1.65, ICC 3.48)、肩峰(ICC 3.66)和尾骨(ICC 1.64)往往具有相对较低的ICC。结论:我们的研究表明,触诊检查的体表上潜在的人体测量标志在检查者内部和内部具有可接受的可靠性;然而,在本研究中,使用测量方法确定肩峰、PSIS和尾骨作为解剖标志仍然很难被认为是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability of anthropometric landmarks on body surface for estimating pelvic incidence without lateral X-ray
Objectives: Increasing attention has been paid to pelvic incidence (PI) as a potential parameter related to low back pain. However, little knowledge exists regarding potential anthropometric landmarks specialized for the estimation of PI. This study aimed to examine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of potential anthropometric landmarks applicable to estimate PI. Methods: Twenty healthcare workers were recruited as participants. Three were experienced physiotherapists for more than 5 years in clinical practice. Eight anatomical landmarks were selected: (1) the acromion, (2) the upper edge of the iliac crest, (3) the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), (4) the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), (5) the upper edge of the greater trochanter, (6) the coccyx, (7) the lateral joint space of the knee, and (8) the lateral malleolus. Photographs of the right-side view of the subjects were used to determine the two-dimensional ( x , y ) coordinates of the landmarks. Results: Most landmark measurements reached acceptable levels for intra-examiner (ICC 1 , 0.64 to 0.98) and inter-examiner reliability (ICC 3 , 0.71 to 0.97). However, as possible anatomical landmarks, the PSIS (ICC 1 0.65, ICC 3 0.48), acromion (ICC 3 0.66), and coccyx (ICC 1 0.64) tended to have relatively low ICCs. Conclusions: Our study suggests that potential anthropometric landmarks on the body surface examined on palpation have acceptable intra- and inter-examiner reliability; however, identifying the acromion, PSIS, and coccyx as anatomical landmarks using the measurement method in this study remain difficult to be considered reliable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信