用于程序正确性证明的基于块的语言

Peter-Michael Osera, D. Wonnacott
{"title":"用于程序正确性证明的基于块的语言","authors":"Peter-Michael Osera, D. Wonnacott","doi":"10.1109/BLOCKS.2017.8120410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While formal mathematical reasoning is the cornerstone of computer science, undergraduates often fail to appreciate the value of mathematical proof in their studies. To alleviate this problem, we propose a novel pedagogy uniting logical reasoning with proofs of program correctness along with a proof assistant, ORC2A, that helps students author proofs in this domain. One of the defining features of ORC2A is that it has a blocks-based surface language of proof to reduce friction when adopting the tool in the classroom. We report on the current progress on ORC2A, in particular, its blocks-based interface, current design consideration, and our plans for evaluating the system.","PeriodicalId":424744,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop (B&B)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A blocks-based language for program correctness proofs\",\"authors\":\"Peter-Michael Osera, D. Wonnacott\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BLOCKS.2017.8120410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While formal mathematical reasoning is the cornerstone of computer science, undergraduates often fail to appreciate the value of mathematical proof in their studies. To alleviate this problem, we propose a novel pedagogy uniting logical reasoning with proofs of program correctness along with a proof assistant, ORC2A, that helps students author proofs in this domain. One of the defining features of ORC2A is that it has a blocks-based surface language of proof to reduce friction when adopting the tool in the classroom. We report on the current progress on ORC2A, in particular, its blocks-based interface, current design consideration, and our plans for evaluating the system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop (B&B)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop (B&B)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BLOCKS.2017.8120410\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop (B&B)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BLOCKS.2017.8120410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

虽然形式数学推理是计算机科学的基石,但本科生往往无法认识到数学证明在学习中的价值。为了缓解这个问题,我们提出了一种新的教学方法,将逻辑推理与程序正确性证明结合起来,并使用证明助手ORC2A,帮助学生在该领域编写证明。ORC2A的定义特征之一是,它具有基于块的表面证明语言,以减少在课堂上采用该工具时的摩擦。我们报告了ORC2A的当前进展,特别是其基于块的接口,当前的设计考虑以及我们评估系统的计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A blocks-based language for program correctness proofs
While formal mathematical reasoning is the cornerstone of computer science, undergraduates often fail to appreciate the value of mathematical proof in their studies. To alleviate this problem, we propose a novel pedagogy uniting logical reasoning with proofs of program correctness along with a proof assistant, ORC2A, that helps students author proofs in this domain. One of the defining features of ORC2A is that it has a blocks-based surface language of proof to reduce friction when adopting the tool in the classroom. We report on the current progress on ORC2A, in particular, its blocks-based interface, current design consideration, and our plans for evaluating the system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信