分析泗水州立法院判决号码:3094/PID。B/2013法官在第114条(2)6月第132条(1)第35条麻醉品法案中提出证据

Tobias Gula Aran
{"title":"分析泗水州立法院判决号码:3094/PID。B/2013法官在第114条(2)6月第132条(1)第35条麻醉品法案中提出证据","authors":"Tobias Gula Aran","doi":"10.35334/AY.V2I1.978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this research examines two issues, namely the Surabaya District Court Decision No. 3094 / Pid.B / 2013 In accordance with Evidence presented at trial and Parameter Verification assessed Judges in Crime Article 114 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 132 ( 1) Act No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, based on a normative juridical research, using the approach of Legislation, Case approach, analytical approach, the purpose of this study was to analyze the state court decision Surabaya number: 3094/Pid.B/2013 appropriate evidence presented at the hearing, stated that in this ruling the judge has not given a sense of justice for law enforcement against criminal acts Narcotics correspond to the penalty set out in the Act, and to describe the parameters of proof is rated Judge in a criminal act of Article 114 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 Year 2009 on Narcotics, as the basis of the assessment of evidence by the judge.Keywords: Court Decision Analysis, Evidence, Narcotics","PeriodicalId":322454,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SURABAYA NOMOR: 3094/PID.B/2013 TENTANG ALAT BUKTI OLEH HAKIM DALAM PASAL 114 AYAT (2) JUNCTO PASAL 132 AYAT (1) UU RI NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Gula Aran\",\"doi\":\"10.35334/AY.V2I1.978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this research examines two issues, namely the Surabaya District Court Decision No. 3094 / Pid.B / 2013 In accordance with Evidence presented at trial and Parameter Verification assessed Judges in Crime Article 114 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 132 ( 1) Act No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, based on a normative juridical research, using the approach of Legislation, Case approach, analytical approach, the purpose of this study was to analyze the state court decision Surabaya number: 3094/Pid.B/2013 appropriate evidence presented at the hearing, stated that in this ruling the judge has not given a sense of justice for law enforcement against criminal acts Narcotics correspond to the penalty set out in the Act, and to describe the parameters of proof is rated Judge in a criminal act of Article 114 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 Year 2009 on Narcotics, as the basis of the assessment of evidence by the judge.Keywords: Court Decision Analysis, Evidence, Narcotics\",\"PeriodicalId\":322454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35334/AY.V2I1.978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35334/AY.V2I1.978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究考察两个问题,即泗水地方法院第3094 / Pid号判决。根据审判时提供的证据和参数验证评估的法官在犯罪第114条第(2)款以及2009年第35号麻醉品法第132(1)条的基础上,基于规范的司法研究,使用立法方法,案例方法,分析方法,本研究的目的是分析州法院泗水号判决:3094/Pid。B / 2013在听证会上适当的证据,表明在这一裁决法官并没有给出一种公正执法对毒品犯罪行为对应的点球,证明和描述参数被法官第114条(2)款规定的犯罪行为与法律第132条(1)款35号2009年在毒品,作为评估的基础证据的法官。关键词:判决分析,证据,毒品
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SURABAYA NOMOR: 3094/PID.B/2013 TENTANG ALAT BUKTI OLEH HAKIM DALAM PASAL 114 AYAT (2) JUNCTO PASAL 132 AYAT (1) UU RI NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA
Abstract In this research examines two issues, namely the Surabaya District Court Decision No. 3094 / Pid.B / 2013 In accordance with Evidence presented at trial and Parameter Verification assessed Judges in Crime Article 114 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 132 ( 1) Act No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, based on a normative juridical research, using the approach of Legislation, Case approach, analytical approach, the purpose of this study was to analyze the state court decision Surabaya number: 3094/Pid.B/2013 appropriate evidence presented at the hearing, stated that in this ruling the judge has not given a sense of justice for law enforcement against criminal acts Narcotics correspond to the penalty set out in the Act, and to describe the parameters of proof is rated Judge in a criminal act of Article 114 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 Year 2009 on Narcotics, as the basis of the assessment of evidence by the judge.Keywords: Court Decision Analysis, Evidence, Narcotics
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信