从软件产品演进的在线评论中半自动提取新需求

Jim Buchan, Muneera Bano, D. Zowghi, Phonephasouk Volabouth
{"title":"从软件产品演进的在线评论中半自动提取新需求","authors":"Jim Buchan, Muneera Bano, D. Zowghi, Phonephasouk Volabouth","doi":"10.1109/ASWEC.2018.00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to improve and increase their utility, software products must evolve continually and incrementally to meet the new requirements of current and future users. Online reviews from users of the software provide a rich and readily available resource for discovering candidate new features for future software releases. However, it is challenging to manually analyze a large volume of potentially unstructured and noisy data to extract useful information to support software release planning decisions. This paper investigates machine learning techniques to automatically identify text that represents users' ideas for new features from their online reviews. A binary classification approach to categorize extracted text as either a feature or non-feature was evaluated experimentally. Three machine learning algorithms were evaluated in the experiments: Naïve Bayes (with multinomial and Bernoulli variants), Support Vector Machines (with linear and multinomial variants) and Logistic Regression. Variations on the configurations of k-fold cross validation, the use of n-grams and review sentiment were also experimentally evaluated. Based on binary classification of over a thousand separate reviews of two products, Trello and Jira, linear Support Vector Machines with review sentiment as an input, using n-gram (1,4) together with k-fold 10 cross validation gave the best performance. The results have confirmed the feasibility and accuracy of semi-automated extraction of candidate requirements from a large volume of unstructured and noisy online user reviews. The next steps planned are to experiment with machine supported grouping, prioritizing and visualizing the extracted features to best support release planners' work, as well as extending the sources of candidate requirements.","PeriodicalId":331846,"journal":{"name":"2018 25th Australasian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Semi-Automated Extraction of New Requirements from Online Reviews for Software Product Evolution\",\"authors\":\"Jim Buchan, Muneera Bano, D. Zowghi, Phonephasouk Volabouth\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASWEC.2018.00013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to improve and increase their utility, software products must evolve continually and incrementally to meet the new requirements of current and future users. Online reviews from users of the software provide a rich and readily available resource for discovering candidate new features for future software releases. However, it is challenging to manually analyze a large volume of potentially unstructured and noisy data to extract useful information to support software release planning decisions. This paper investigates machine learning techniques to automatically identify text that represents users' ideas for new features from their online reviews. A binary classification approach to categorize extracted text as either a feature or non-feature was evaluated experimentally. Three machine learning algorithms were evaluated in the experiments: Naïve Bayes (with multinomial and Bernoulli variants), Support Vector Machines (with linear and multinomial variants) and Logistic Regression. Variations on the configurations of k-fold cross validation, the use of n-grams and review sentiment were also experimentally evaluated. Based on binary classification of over a thousand separate reviews of two products, Trello and Jira, linear Support Vector Machines with review sentiment as an input, using n-gram (1,4) together with k-fold 10 cross validation gave the best performance. The results have confirmed the feasibility and accuracy of semi-automated extraction of candidate requirements from a large volume of unstructured and noisy online user reviews. The next steps planned are to experiment with machine supported grouping, prioritizing and visualizing the extracted features to best support release planners' work, as well as extending the sources of candidate requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 25th Australasian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 25th Australasian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2018.00013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 25th Australasian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2018.00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

为了改进和增加它们的效用,软件产品必须不断地和增量地发展,以满足当前和未来用户的新需求。来自软件用户的在线评论为发现未来软件版本的候选新特性提供了丰富且随时可用的资源。然而,手动分析大量潜在的非结构化和嘈杂的数据以提取有用的信息来支持软件发布计划决策是具有挑战性的。本文研究了机器学习技术,以自动识别代表用户在线评论中新功能想法的文本。实验评估了一种将提取的文本分类为特征或非特征的二元分类方法。在实验中评估了三种机器学习算法:Naïve贝叶斯(具有多项和伯努利变量),支持向量机(具有线性和多项变量)和逻辑回归。k-fold交叉验证配置的变化,n-grams的使用和评论情绪也进行了实验评估。基于对Trello和Jira两种产品的一千多个独立评论的二元分类,以评论情绪为输入,使用n-gram(1,4)和k-fold 10交叉验证的线性支持向量机给出了最佳性能。结果证实了从大量非结构化和嘈杂的在线用户评论中半自动提取候选需求的可行性和准确性。计划的下一个步骤是用机器支持的分组、优先级和可视化提取的特征来最好地支持发布计划者的工作,以及扩展候选需求的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Semi-Automated Extraction of New Requirements from Online Reviews for Software Product Evolution
In order to improve and increase their utility, software products must evolve continually and incrementally to meet the new requirements of current and future users. Online reviews from users of the software provide a rich and readily available resource for discovering candidate new features for future software releases. However, it is challenging to manually analyze a large volume of potentially unstructured and noisy data to extract useful information to support software release planning decisions. This paper investigates machine learning techniques to automatically identify text that represents users' ideas for new features from their online reviews. A binary classification approach to categorize extracted text as either a feature or non-feature was evaluated experimentally. Three machine learning algorithms were evaluated in the experiments: Naïve Bayes (with multinomial and Bernoulli variants), Support Vector Machines (with linear and multinomial variants) and Logistic Regression. Variations on the configurations of k-fold cross validation, the use of n-grams and review sentiment were also experimentally evaluated. Based on binary classification of over a thousand separate reviews of two products, Trello and Jira, linear Support Vector Machines with review sentiment as an input, using n-gram (1,4) together with k-fold 10 cross validation gave the best performance. The results have confirmed the feasibility and accuracy of semi-automated extraction of candidate requirements from a large volume of unstructured and noisy online user reviews. The next steps planned are to experiment with machine supported grouping, prioritizing and visualizing the extracted features to best support release planners' work, as well as extending the sources of candidate requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信