印尼更新投资法的兴起与投资争端解决

Tubagus Andri Purnama, Yohanes Firmansyah, Anna Maria Tri Anggraini‬, Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom, Imam Hartanto
{"title":"印尼更新投资法的兴起与投资争端解决","authors":"Tubagus Andri Purnama, Yohanes Firmansyah, Anna Maria Tri Anggraini‬, Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom, Imam Hartanto","doi":"10.55606/jurrish.v1i2.403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal certainty can be reached by good and explicit principles in a legislation, as well as its application. Investment requires legal certainty as well. On April 26, 2007, the Investment Law No. 25 of 2007 was enacted. This legislation was enacted to replace Law No. 1 of 1967 on Foreign Investment and Law No. 6 of 1968 on Domestic Investment. There are eleven factors that serve as benchmarks for gauging a country's ease of doing business. One of the indications is related to the resolution of investment conflicts, or in this case, contract enforcement and bankruptcy proceedings. According to the Doing Business 2019 report, Indonesia ranks 73rd (seventy-three) in terms of ease of doing business. Indonesia's EoDB ranking remains distant from the aim of entering the world's top 40 (forty) ranks. This is due to the fact that, among other things, dispute resolution in Indonesia still has various issues, including basic regulations, the trial procedure, and decision implementation. Meanwhile, affordable, fast, and simple conflict resolution facilities are required in the corporate world (according to EoDB indications). The results of this descriptive analytical research utilizing a normative juridical approach reveal that there is no implementing regulation of Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment, which focuses on discussing investment disputes, therefore there is no strong legal certainty in investing in Indonesia. Furthermore, there are several issues concerning the resolution of bankruptcy cases, some of which stem from regulations, namely Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, some of which can result in certain interests, the length of the bankruptcy court process, and legal certainty following the bankruptcy decision. A breakthrough or update that can support EoDB is required, one of which can be done in the field of investment dispute resolution, particularly connected to contract enforcement and bankruptcy case settlement, by creating implementing regulations and updating associated regulations.","PeriodicalId":136975,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU SOSIAL, POLITIK DAN HUMANIORA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Urgence of Renewal Investment Law and Investment Dispute Settlement in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Tubagus Andri Purnama, Yohanes Firmansyah, Anna Maria Tri Anggraini‬, Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom, Imam Hartanto\",\"doi\":\"10.55606/jurrish.v1i2.403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Legal certainty can be reached by good and explicit principles in a legislation, as well as its application. Investment requires legal certainty as well. On April 26, 2007, the Investment Law No. 25 of 2007 was enacted. This legislation was enacted to replace Law No. 1 of 1967 on Foreign Investment and Law No. 6 of 1968 on Domestic Investment. There are eleven factors that serve as benchmarks for gauging a country's ease of doing business. One of the indications is related to the resolution of investment conflicts, or in this case, contract enforcement and bankruptcy proceedings. According to the Doing Business 2019 report, Indonesia ranks 73rd (seventy-three) in terms of ease of doing business. Indonesia's EoDB ranking remains distant from the aim of entering the world's top 40 (forty) ranks. This is due to the fact that, among other things, dispute resolution in Indonesia still has various issues, including basic regulations, the trial procedure, and decision implementation. Meanwhile, affordable, fast, and simple conflict resolution facilities are required in the corporate world (according to EoDB indications). The results of this descriptive analytical research utilizing a normative juridical approach reveal that there is no implementing regulation of Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment, which focuses on discussing investment disputes, therefore there is no strong legal certainty in investing in Indonesia. Furthermore, there are several issues concerning the resolution of bankruptcy cases, some of which stem from regulations, namely Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, some of which can result in certain interests, the length of the bankruptcy court process, and legal certainty following the bankruptcy decision. A breakthrough or update that can support EoDB is required, one of which can be done in the field of investment dispute resolution, particularly connected to contract enforcement and bankruptcy case settlement, by creating implementing regulations and updating associated regulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU SOSIAL, POLITIK DAN HUMANIORA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU SOSIAL, POLITIK DAN HUMANIORA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v1i2.403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU SOSIAL, POLITIK DAN HUMANIORA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v1i2.403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法律确定性可以通过立法中良好和明确的原则以及立法的适用来实现。投资也需要法律上的确定性。2007年4月26日,《投资法》第25号颁布实施。颁布这项立法是为了取代关于外国投资法的1967年第1号法和关于国内投资法的1968年第6号法。有11个因素可以作为衡量一个国家做生意容易程度的基准。其中一个迹象与解决投资冲突有关,或者在这种情况下,是合同执行和破产程序。根据《2019年营商环境报告》,印尼在营商便利度方面排名第73位(73位)。印尼的EoDB排名距离进入世界前40名的目标还很遥远。这是因为,除其他事项外,印度尼西亚的争议解决仍然存在各种问题,包括基本规定,审判程序和决定执行。同时,在企业世界中需要负担得起的、快速的和简单的冲突解决设施(根据EoDB指示)。利用规范性司法方法进行的描述性分析研究的结果表明,2007年关于投资的第25号法律没有实施法规,该法规侧重于讨论投资纠纷,因此在印度尼西亚投资没有很强的法律确定性。此外,还有一些关于破产案件解决的问题,其中一些源于法规,即2004年关于破产和延期偿债义务的第37号法律,其中一些可能导致某些利益,破产法院程序的长度以及破产决定后的法律确定性。需要一个能够支持EoDB的突破或更新,其中一个可以在投资争端解决领域完成,特别是与合同执行和破产案件解决相关的领域,通过创建实施法规和更新相关法规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Urgence of Renewal Investment Law and Investment Dispute Settlement in Indonesia
Legal certainty can be reached by good and explicit principles in a legislation, as well as its application. Investment requires legal certainty as well. On April 26, 2007, the Investment Law No. 25 of 2007 was enacted. This legislation was enacted to replace Law No. 1 of 1967 on Foreign Investment and Law No. 6 of 1968 on Domestic Investment. There are eleven factors that serve as benchmarks for gauging a country's ease of doing business. One of the indications is related to the resolution of investment conflicts, or in this case, contract enforcement and bankruptcy proceedings. According to the Doing Business 2019 report, Indonesia ranks 73rd (seventy-three) in terms of ease of doing business. Indonesia's EoDB ranking remains distant from the aim of entering the world's top 40 (forty) ranks. This is due to the fact that, among other things, dispute resolution in Indonesia still has various issues, including basic regulations, the trial procedure, and decision implementation. Meanwhile, affordable, fast, and simple conflict resolution facilities are required in the corporate world (according to EoDB indications). The results of this descriptive analytical research utilizing a normative juridical approach reveal that there is no implementing regulation of Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment, which focuses on discussing investment disputes, therefore there is no strong legal certainty in investing in Indonesia. Furthermore, there are several issues concerning the resolution of bankruptcy cases, some of which stem from regulations, namely Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, some of which can result in certain interests, the length of the bankruptcy court process, and legal certainty following the bankruptcy decision. A breakthrough or update that can support EoDB is required, one of which can be done in the field of investment dispute resolution, particularly connected to contract enforcement and bankruptcy case settlement, by creating implementing regulations and updating associated regulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信